Comment: You said

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I don't see it like that at all. (see in situ)

You said

" All they have to do is think there is a threat and they will take out what they think that threat is."

That's the notion of Preemptive war, is it not? We think there MIGHT be a threat, so we're going to "take it out."

Granger, do you support preemptive war?

That's also what the DHS does and says to justify taking out patriot groups. It's what abusive police say to justify killing an unarmed black woman in DC. We THINK there is a threat, and so we take her out. No judge, no jury, no investigation...just take her out.

Do you really support these notions, or am I misunderstanding you? No hostility intended, I'm just not getting what you mean. Do you believe in preemptive war and preemptive strike?