Comment: Let's take a look at your (mis)information

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Let's take a look at your post ... (see in situ)

Let's take a look at your (mis)information

The below is the key component of FEMA's structural misrepresentation to NIST who did no have building plans. BTW, the OP info is okay. Accepted, agreed. This post might help provide real explanations if one digs at the links from the page below.

"The "charges" did not need to present exterior damage because the twin towers were supported by 47 core columns that were all on the interior."

Here is the evidence of this deception by FEMA, which the infiltrated, false truth movement believes without question relating to the structure.

The structure they believe is impossible to demo in the way which was seen and heard on 9-11. That really make the truth movement look stupid.

It takes knowledge of structural engineering to evaluate this. R. Gage has refused to discuss it so pleeeeeze, do not mention him or chandler.

http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html

Pleeeze DO NOT comment in reply if you do not have that expertise. If you do comment, no matter what, support each statement with independently verified information. Such is exactly what you will find at that link.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?