Comment: who knows

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: ... (see in situ)

who knows

It presents some possibly interesting constitutional issues. Also, I think plenty of attorneys would "touch this" if they could be paid reasonably for it. You state no reasoning - because you have none - for your opinion to the contrary. The fact that he had an attorney before, and has one now, shows you are wrong twice already. Nt that it ever stopped you. Go for 3?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein