Comment: And?

(See in situ)


And?

I never said Cuccinelli was better economically than Sarvis. My point in criticizing Sarvis is that he's not even a good protest vote, he's not a pure libertarian. So don't pretend like you're voting for Sarvis because you won't compromise: a vote for Sarvis is a compromise. But, unlike a vote for Cuccinelli, it's a compromise with no upside, nothing to be gained.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."