Comment: Non-criminals?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Tax can be voluntary, if tax (see in situ)


I don't know why this question is addressing me, if that is the intent here.

Anyone can easily understand why criminals resort to the use of False Fronts.

The point I tried to make has to do with how current victims work to become former victims.

I don't call crimes by any other names, because I have no reason to hide the criminals behind false names.

Is that clear, or not clear, or slightly not clear?

If it is not clear, then what might be preventing it from being clear?