Comment: Who is angry?

(See in situ)

In post: I Am That
In reply to comment: Sir, your words are not accurate: (see in situ)

Who is angry?

Who is unkind? The kindest thing I did was reply to you to help you think outside of your dedicated concepts.
You are the one making judgements based on my simple, boiled down reply. You are the one accepting new concepts to describe old concepts. You are the one deciding what meditation 'has' to be. You are the one telling me, or everyone else for that matter, that we must subscribe to your prescribed excercises in order to meditate. What do you know of this entity called 'stm'?
I read what Allegory wrote, saw the forum he placed his OP under and questioned why he added a new concept to 'life' and its experiences and the teachings of Nisargadatta. You jumped in and wanted me to accept this new concept based on what? Your acceptance of Allegory's new concept?
I posit you are perturbed with me for challenging your concepts. Again, my advice is to read all Nisargadatta's books have you not already done so.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison