Comment: Cooch is more libertarian than Sarvis

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Cooch is definitely not a (see in situ)

coffee_sponge's picture

Cooch is more libertarian than Sarvis

IMHO. And I agree with the Pauls' decision to support him.

We can't afford to hold our breath until the "perfect" candidate comes along. Cooch certainly wasn't perfect, but he was a good choice overall with a real chance to win.

Sarvis didn't have a snowball's chance, and he held statist positions.

Getting traction for a third party is such an uphill battle, if we could actually muster the resources to achieve it we would already have the resources to turn things around without a third party.

So what's the point?

All the Sarvis fiasco accomplished was to get a corporatist sleazeball elected.