Comment: Hmmm...

(See in situ)


Hmmm...

Let's see...

"Question is simple: Do you accept that no one has the right to force you to pay for enforcement of laws which you find morally repugnant?"

This is a bit tricky. What if I believe that selling someone as a slave is wrong, but my neighbor supports that as a choice that should be available in the open market? We find out that some slave-trader is operating in the area. I (and like-minded abolitionists) hire private enforcers of what we see as natural law to go free the slaves (defend their self-ownership right) and bring the trader to justice. My neighbor (and like-minded supporters of slavery) hire their own people to support the defense of the trader against what they consider a violation of their Liberty and property rights.

So do I have any right to not only support the effort against the trader, but to also send my hired help to block or seize the payments my neighbor is making to his hired help -- maybe even forcing him to pay a penalty for assisting in the crime? This would in effect be similar to forcing my neighbor to support my effort to begin with. Then what if he sends his hired help to do the same to me? Who is in the right? Just whoever wins the contest? Other people who don't get involved one way or the other, or who limit their efforts to educating or spiritually reviving the morality of the people to eschew slavery?