YOUR ARGUMENT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, ON ANY LEVEL The metal was already available and was easily and readily assessable through the Silver Certificate system, if he wanted to make it available all he had to do was expand the Silver Certificate system, but he didn't, he had already stopped the redemption of $5 and $10 Silver Certificates and then he went on to stop the redemption of $1 Silver Certificates and set the stage for the final removal of silver coins from circulation.
You are simply making assumptions and calling those assumptions facts. You state, without any evidence whatsoever, that "he was retiring the silver notes to make the metal available, perhaps $20 and $100 pieces" Where is your evidence? That is the classic characteristic of a shill, someone who, despite all the evidence to the contrary would rather believe and promote an utter falsehood that has not evidence in history.
SUE, PROVIDE US PROOF INSTEAD OF SIMPLE ASSERTIONS, PROVIDE FACTS INSTEAD OF ASSUMPTIONS! BECAUSE SO FAR THAT IS ALL YOU HAVE WRITTEN, NO REAL LINKS, NO PROOF, ONLY ASSUMPTIONS YOU PAWN OFF AS FACTS! ADDITIONALLY, PROVIDE ME ANY EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS $4.3 BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF UNITED STATES NOTES ISSUED AND WHERE IS THE LAW PASSED OR THE EXECUTIVE ORDER AUTHORIZING SUCH AN ISSUE.
I know you don't need to understand all the details because obviously the truth does not matter to you, only the Idolatry of your precious Conspiracy Theory! If you were indeed interested in the truth then you would actually investigate no matter what the outcome of that investigation, but NO, that is of absolutely no interest to you, instead you make it out that assumptions are true, when they are not, nor can you support your assertions by any factual information, only assumption, now that is truly classic of a person who has had the wool pulled over their own intellect and would rather believe something no matter whether it is true or not!
I have given you far more evidence that totally contradicts any evidence that you have been able to provide, you have yet to provide any actual historical evidence in the form of LINKs that substantiate your assertion.
YOU CHOSE TO PROMOTE, INTENTIONALLY, SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN NEITHER SUBSTANTIATE EITHER HISTORICALLY OR LOGICALLY!
"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise repre