Comment: If you are not missing it, why are you not discussing

(See in situ)


If you are not missing it, why are you not discussing

mass involvement?

The fact that there is an infiltrating government pretending to be "lawful" (not in our terms) and benevolent but is really dismantling the constitution on a monthly basis with no regard for any of your accurate points underlying the philosophy of law, seems to escape you also. We need to act.

The governed are so confused and dependent that only a clear example of principle relative to conditions descending upon us al,l will serve to guide them to the unity needed to survive. When masses make a claim, it is heard. And, it doesn't much matter how at that point. However, fully lawful really helps. So consider following what I'm doing here and seek those aspects I've missed where indeed, your information can become useful.

That is what I'm proposing. That the educated in all these things get off of their high horse and humbly gather to make agreements upon simple definitions of constitutional intent so the less educated, less motivated, more confused and fearful, can see and UNDERSTAND real hope in a simple unified agreement of humanity that our constitution happens to also support; in order to set an example and initiate mass assembly around constitutional concepts.

So thank you for accepting that indeed free speech has the purpose of assuring information vital to survival is shared and understood.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?