Comment: Really?

(See in situ)


What is a "Citizen"?

If one does not know what a "Citizen" is then how can one claim to be such a thing. Why would would anyone make a claim? They are the ones' making claims. Why not just find out if they can prove their own claims are true according to their own rules of evidence?

I agree that one should always appear specially. As far as the name thing I have found that saying My name is "Name" is just as effective (if not more effective) because they are saying "NAME" and I am saying "My name is "Name"". They claim possession of the NAME but I claim possession and ownership of "My Name". You definitely don't want to say "present" when they call "NAME". Usually if they do a roll call and sayyou must say "present" when your NAME is called I respond with "My Name is "Name" and I am here by special appearance only".

Don't ever let them control the flow of the case. They will try to scare you with threats fear and intimidation to force compliance but the fact is that this is a crime if they attempt to threaten you when you are simply trying to discover all the facts of their claims.

I would NEVER claim to be a Citizen or citizen. I am a man as in governments are instituted among "men" deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Rights are endowed by their creator and our law explicitly states that "men" are the creators of their governmental Citizen capacity. In fact Montana Man may lose becase he consented to being a "Citizen". That was a bad move and he will likely lose because of this, because it will be construed as "consent of the governed".

I have even been arrested before for not making a claim to be a "US citizen" when asked by a "law enforcement agent" if I am a "US citizen" but I won that "case" too when the DA made the officer leave the court room when I appeared specially.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...