Comment: If you cannot show overt respect for the vital purpose

(See in situ)


If you cannot show overt respect for the vital purpose

of free speech assuring survival then you are against American unity by example. A biologist would extend that to humanity.

So, if I do not accept your description of "free speech", and state it publicly as fact for all to see, then I am undermining the constitution

If you cannot comment upon preparatory amendment then you are acting against our capacity to defend our constitution which logically requires citizens to know constitutional intent in order to assure all amendments have it. Free speech has this purpose. Article V is the right to "alter or abolish" abusive gov described in the DOI.

If you cannot respect the intent of the constitution, then you will have no respect for the vital aspects of its rights and their purposes of enabling our unity in defense of it. Your action with words represents a covert social attack upon the very human principles underlying these rights.

This is a very logical test, and you are failing.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?