Comment: First chance?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: And that my friend is exactly (see in situ)

GoodSamaritan's picture

First chance?

No, I take many such opportunities to point out that belief in The Flying Probability Monster and his Magic Wand is likewise based upon unprovable presuppositions. It's astonishing to me that so many people in the 21st century still put their hope in a chemically impossible event and at the same time attack the messengers who point out more rational explanations for the facts uncovered by science.

And, yes, I was attacked, albeit indirectly: "...you have to be able to make logic based arguments instead of something that's arbitrary and completely unproveable." A clear reference to the OP's faith.

Arbitrary and completely unprovable - a good description for the general theory of evolution.

Two articles I've read lately addressing my point:
http://creation.com/origin-of-life
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/11/fred-reed/darwinism-is-no...

Ron Paul - Honorary Founding Father