Comment: Rights are Inherent to One's Constitution

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: But how can it be a "right" (see in situ)

Rights are Inherent to One's Constitution

Rights are inherent to one's constitution. They are not "permission" to act. Rights exist in a person, because the person exists. Morality becomes relevant in the issues of willingness, "Free Will", to assert Rights and to accept consequences.

Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Amendment I restricts the powers of Congress, preventing abridgment of already existing freedoms.
Amendment I does not give permissions.

The Bill of Rights, intended to prevent misconstruction and abuse of Constitutional powers, was adopted to declare and restrict legislative abridgment of specific existing freedoms, which are recognized as inherent to each individual.

In other words, the Bill of Rights was adopted to restrict the capabilities of immoral, would-be tyrants.