Comment: I don't get it.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I'm sorry that you were (see in situ)

I don't get it.

BILL3, please forgive my ignorance. But, I don't get it.

Why do you consider it a hard truth that naturalism embraces no moral demands?

As I understand naturalism, it is a philosophical position that understands that most supernatural hypotheses are either false or (as often in my view) not significantly different from most natural phenomena or hypotheses.

If one considers there to be little difference between the supernatural and the natural, then you have no debate.

My philosophy has its roots in naturalism. Libertarian ideals fit nicely into my worldview, as well.

Are you saying that I am intellectually dishonest?