The central message of anything written or spoken is carried by the context, which is what semantics would attempt to explore. If only the general IQ in this field were higher than room-temp . . .
It seems pretty clear to me that what you call psychology is a failure to accept any outward, extra-human existence of both law and God, and you declare your own semantics the final authority as your effort. You call any other context "minutiae". Many people do this, assured that anything beyond what they believe is nothing but confusion, so don't think I'm picking on you. Both religion and political philosophy are a quagmire of circular logic because of this fact.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: