Comment: This is about coercion and

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: George Ought To Help (see in situ)

This is about coercion and

This is about coercion and how it's unethical to force someone to render aid (ie taxes). I'm not making that argument at all. I agree with this video. I don't believe anything I've put forward here disagrees with it.

The non aggression principle is intended to weed out unethical actions from the ethical ones. Forcing anyone to act according to your will is wrong according to NAP but only IF that person has not initiated aggression upon you.

I'm investigating scenarios that people often bring up in an attempt to dismiss/disprove the non aggression principle so I have something intelligent to respond to criticism with.

I am an advocate NAP. I believe criticisms of it can be remedied with a more robust definition of aggression.