Not that there's anything wrong with that...
What's wrong is this is exactly how disinformation works. Take something that is credible sounding and report it as actual fact. In many cases the disinfo may actually be accurate - as in the case of Edward Snowden, who almost certainly set up certain 'doomsday' precautions to guard his own life, like an email scheduled to be sent unless he prevents it from being sent every day or week. It's an old trick.
The problem is that once this story is repeated and a source is requested, all it traces back to is some anonymous blog. This causes the story-repeater to lose credibility, the exact objective of the disinfo.
Sounds good but I'm not buying it.
9-11 was a panda job.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: