Comment: does not matter who hired

(See in situ)


does not matter who hired

Have you ever thought that, perhaps, both sides "benefited" from the casualties of unarmed civilians?

The former opposition used this to justify their civil disobedience and riots.

The Russians used this to justify occupation of Crimea.

At this point it does not matter who hired snipers, the outcome is acceleration of the processes that had to happen anyway.

The question has to be raised, who benefited MOST (if you will excuse me using macabre concept "benefit" and civilian casualties in one rant)? The answer is that Russians are clearly benefiting in the game of political chess.

As always, unarmed civilians are merely pawns in the game.

Engage in Secure Exchange