Comment: Umm

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Wrong! Minor v. Happersett (see in situ)


I agree with what you just wrote. Except the part that Minor v Happersett had the judges ruling on the Article II clause. That courtroom would be in error and would have cause for appeal if the judges even considered the Article II NBC clause (obviously you can't appeal SCOTUS, but the judges would be incompetent to consider Article II in this case). The article II clause is utterly and completely irrelevant to ANY of the facts in Minor vs. Happersett. No judge or lawyer in their right mind would think that case has any influence on the interpretation of the Article II NBC clause.

And in both cases that cite Minor, neither one of them had anything to do with presidential eligibility or article II.

"Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito."