Comment: Misled Troop

(See in situ)


Misled Troop

In Liberty we are all capable of being jurists in the pool and troops on the ground in the face of enemies foreign and domestic.

The advice by this misled person is to quit the Military?

Please consider reading this:

http://www.amazon.com/Boyd-The-Fighter-Pilot-Changed/dp/0316...

Our country will, or will not, be defended against enemies FOREIGN by the Military born out of this country.

The Military born out of this country will be defended by that Military or there will be no Liberty - end of story.

At home the battle will be won if the Military is backed up by defenders of Liberty at home, fighting enemies Domestic.

You won't know what I'm speaking about unless you read what John Boyd did when John Boyd was in the Military.

If you do read what John Boyd did when John Boyd was in the Military then you can get an idea about what I am speaking about, don't quit, make the Military a force in defense of Liberty instead of quitting the Military born out of this country? Note the question mark.

Examples are all over the place, not just the example set by John Boyd.

______________________________________________________________
Helicopter pilot Hugh Thompson reported mass killings and murder to his company commander, Major Fredrick Watke; his allegations were supported by other pilots and crew men who had been flying over My Lai as support. Thompson had landed his helicopter multiple times to assist inhabitants and to stop the killing. At one point Thompson instructed door-gunner Lawrence Colburn to aim at American soldiers to prevent them from shooting at villagers. He waited there until the villagers could be evacuated. In a second incident they transported a wounded boy to the nearby city, where they knew he would be taken care of.
_________________________________________________________________

That is from here:
https://sites.google.com/a/umn.edu/historpedia/home/politics...

That is information. That is not actual people faced with very real cases of the absolute necessity to know precisely who is friend and who is foe - that is merely information pointing in that direction where actual people faced kill or be killed situations involving friends or foes in time and place.

How about this:
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,90677,00.html

Is that accurate information offered by friends in the Military or is that false information intending to confuse the enemy? I don't know, do you? Whose job is it to police the military?

Civilians with pretty faces?

Civilians with ugly faces?

Specialists specializing in knowing precisely who is friend and who is foe are trained in Military training to do so.

Who is training the trainers?

Look in the mirror.

If enemies of all that is good have taken over at home, then the Military born out of this country, at home, will face horror while they are placed in impossible situations and some of those specialists will lead the rest of those specialists in defending all that is good at home or NOT.

That battle in the Military will be won or lost in the Military. The Military code of conduct will either work or it won't, but having all the good people in the Military leave the Military is probably not good advice. I'm not in the Military. I can't offer advice.

I can offer examples of those who were, or are, in the Military.

One of my living Hero's is a young man who just joined up. He still has a positive attitude, a good attitude, and he is doing what he thinks is the right thing, on his own volition.

I can report back as that one Hero does what can be done in his world of his choosing.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Gulag-Archipelago-1918-1956-Invest...

That is a story of a Military Soldier speaking out against a Criminal Military Leader named Stalin.

That story ought to be read carefully by those defenders at home as well as those defenders already in the Military of any country anywhere on this planet.

There is sound advice of reality in that book.

Examples of sound advice of reality by that author can be found.

I'll look and report back:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Those are the words of someone who was attacked by his fellow defenders in a Military Dictatorship.

Just because someone wears a colorful uniform does not make someone an authority over right and wrong. The individual either does, or does not, make the right, or the wrong, decisions in time and place.

I hope you have a wonderful day.

Read carefully, there is much falsehood offered as wisdom.

Good luck.

P.S.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrtDOjdwqyY

Examples exist. What do those examples offer?

Joe