Comment: Monopoly Rule of Law

(See in situ)

Monopoly Rule of Law

The description offered appears to be a number of people volunteering to invest into the concept of Rule of Law which is also known as common law.

Those types of investments work in places where the people are not fooled into a false belief in the counterfeit version being the genuine version of a voluntary association.

Those types of investments can be understood as a simple insurance policy that pays dividends to the investors in the form of an effective defense against criminals.

What happens when the criminals start running these insurance accounting services?

In common law there was stipulations in the policy, not necessarily written down into a contract, whereby the investors could hold the insurance policy accountants to undergo an accurate accounting of their work being done in the work they are hired to do, which is receiving payments and spending those payments out of the FUND so as to benefit the investors in specific ways enumerated in the contract.

I know this may not sound accurate to anyone but a few, but then again most people are fooled into the abject belief that their "Tax Payments" now are their investments in defense of Liberty, which it patently false, as their "Tax Payments" now are accurately accountable as extortion payments paid into a FUND that is the spent on methods by which those payments are used to destroy any competition anywhere, whereby the competitors seek to compete in that insurance market knowable as "government."

The missing element in the TOPIC here for discussion, other than accurate accounting as a demand by the people OURSELVES, with few exceptions, is the concept of insuring in the preservation of competition within the "government" insurance market.

That missing element was exemplified by the employment of the concept of Voluntary Federation.

If, for example, New Jersey people formed a Monopoly Rule of Law, and New York people formed a Monopoly Rule of Law, and 11 groups of people in other areas form a Monopoly Rule of Law, then there would be 13 competitive Monopoly Rule of Law groups of people investing in their own effective mutual defense INCLUDING common law defense against those who are TRUSTED with keeping the accounts accurate.

The method of preserving the elements of competition was Federation, or voluntary investments paid out of the Constitutional Republic FUNDS into a Central FUND, so as to increase the defensive power of the 13 Monopoly Rule of Law Constitutional Republics in cases where all the people in the country were being threatened by very large armies of criminals; a.k.a. The British (Bank of England).

That is explained well here:


Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.

Since I speak a foreign language (accurate accounting) the words authored by me are not in demand, so words written by other people may work better to reach the goal of accurate accounting.

Invest in false accounting for over 200 years and you can easily see the benefits you get for such naked aggression (The Emperor has no clothes).