"If people bought up the 4 spaces of land around my holding and built a tower of Babel around my property and cut my water off, I would be the aggressive party to climb over the wall."
I don't think a trespasser fits the true definition of demonstrating "aggression" to a warrant justifiable violent self-defense as permitted by NAP.
This is a straw argument that precludes any attempts by either party that would practice NAP to negotiate the right of way or other easements--you cannot be a libertarian or a anarchist without the common sense that your actions need to preclude violence and conflict prior to making such arrangements if you really, truly want a live and let live world.
Conscience does not exist if not exercised
"No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up!
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the