Comment: Your defintion of agression is too broad

(See in situ)


Your defintion of agression is too broad

"If people bought up the 4 spaces of land around my holding and built a tower of Babel around my property and cut my water off, I would be the aggressive party to climb over the wall."

I don't think a trespasser fits the true definition of demonstrating "aggression" to a warrant justifiable violent self-defense as permitted by NAP.

This is a straw argument that precludes any attempts by either party that would practice NAP to negotiate the right of way or other easements--you cannot be a libertarian or a anarchist without the common sense that your actions need to preclude violence and conflict prior to making such arrangements if you really, truly want a live and let live world.

Conscience does not exist if not exercised

"No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up!
---Lily Tomlin