Comment: In my opinion, the main problem with saying it was a "Hoax"

(See in situ)


In my opinion, the main problem with saying it was a "Hoax"

There were victims, including women & children, who had both of their lower limbs before and during that day, right up until the bombing event happened, and then not surprisingly after had limbs missing/amputated.

How do the "Hoax" promoters/defenders account for that?

Simple, by not showing you any of that counterevidence that doesn't support a "Hoax," instead they lie by omission while [sometimes] making what appears to be convincing presentations that support the event being a "Hoax."