Comment: Study material?

(See in situ)


Study material?

http://archive.org/stream/secretproceedin00convgoog#page/n14...

____________________________________________
One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished.
_______________________________________________

Knowing what I know now I think the way to solve that problem would be to convince the Slave Traders in the South that the Central Banker Frauds in the North were getting the better of the Slave Traders in the South with their Dirty Compromise (3/5th clause) and that the deal was off, no way, no how, should those Slave Traders in the South agree to Divide and Conquer all the Slaves North and South in this way, because the Northern Central Banking Criminals would eventually Invade the South and Destroy Everything worth anything, to indoctrinate, consolidate, consume, all the slaves North and South into one Criminal Banking Fraud and Extortion Racket, so don't do it, don't do it, in your own Slave Trading best Interest, don't do it, man, don't do it.

See?

If those Criminals running the Slavery in the South (not all people in the South were criminal slave traders) were to then distrust the North Central Banking Cabal (Hamilton, Morris, Washington, Adams, etc.), then the deal would be off, or those Criminals would insist upon greater "interest" or greater advantage in dividing up the spoils of their "mutual" conquest.

At the same time, on the other hand, words to the Northern Banking Cabal seeding distrust in their Southern Criminal Comrades could be said along the lines of a future Confederate deal being done to create a competitive Central Bank, producing competitive fraud money from a private Southern banking cabal, in direct competition against, and in secret, the Northern Central Banking Private/Public/Corporate/Monopoly Interests.

Once the Southern criminals understand precisely how criminal their Northern criminal rivals are, in fact, and visa versa, the momentary truce (a truce broken by the inevitable "Civil War" Pogrom) among the Northern and Southern Slave Traders (slavery of different colors is still slavery) would not have managed to bear the fruit of Consolidation/Monopolization/Incorporation with those get out of jail free cards given to the winners of their perpetual pogroms.

End of the Dirty Compromise before it can follow through, and you can ignore my offer all you want, some people among us do actually read plain English.

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/docs/foundingdo...

__________________________________________________
Antifederalist No. 15

RHODE ISLAND IS RIGHT!

This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-America Intelligencer?)

The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious
work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.

They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may soon produce an immense revenue; and, in the interim, Congress may raise in the old manner the taxes which shall be found necessary for the support of the government.

The state of Rhode Island refused to send delegates to the Federal Convention, and the event has manifested that their refusal was a happy one as the new constitution, which the Convention has proposed to us, is an elective monarchy, which is proverbially the worst government. This new government would have been supported at a vast expense, by which our taxes-the right of which is solely vested in Congress, (a circumstance which manifests that the various states of the union will be merely corporations) -- would be doubled or trebled. The liberty of the press is not stipulated for, and therefore may be invaded at pleasure. The supreme continental court is to have, almost in every case, "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact," which signifies, if there is any meaning in words, the setting aside the trial by jury.
___________________________________________________

http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentuck...

_____________________________________________________
But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."
__________________________________________________

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

And:

_____________________________________________________
Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.
____________________________________________

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/unified-california-ca...
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/unified-california-ca...
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/unified-california-ca...

Why go back in time when the solution is right in our laps now?

Joe