Comment: On the contrary, its very usefull to counter the absurd

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Your primary argument is that (see in situ)

On the contrary, its very usefull to counter the absurd

You must be the one of the re-enforcements from "Con-Shills" headquarters. It is your ilk that deny the prima facia evidence in the skies and twist the testimony of whistle-blowers that give mounds of evidence that aerosol weather manipulation is not only a possibility but a real probability.

1- Answer: Whats in the bloody fuel anyway? This is a possible way to disperse aerosol particles. Then there is HAARP etc.(so it's not possible???)

2- Answer: Clearly there is a separate commercial flight program (possibly fuel additives) and then there is the covert (military) side to this - possibly spraying direct aerosols - lots of evidence in this post to suggest the probability is real. (whistle-blowers - strange flight patterns that defy commercial traffic)

To say this is not possible and maybe even probable defies all logic. It is intellectually dishonest to say that the above is absolutely NOT possible.

It can't be...can it?