If borders are an obstacle toward freedom, then is the move toward a democratic-global-government actually a move toward freedom? Since it would deminish the relevance of borders? And would bring the service of property rights, and human rights, protection to a larger percentage of the world?
As long as such a government were limited in scope?
Or is the move to a free society one which we approach in the opposite fashion, of liberating individual-by-individual until government reflect the new moral composition of its people?
If so, wouldn't a limited-democratic global government represent the ultimate end of such an individual movement?
Or is possible to represent this Peace and Freedom with borders and potentially conflicting nations?