I would call your model voluntary; until, a property owner decides that he no longer consents to the rules and decides to no longer pay resources to the institution which is responsible for enforcing the rules.
In this case I would call the model voluntary IF that institution did not exact payment from he who no longer consents through use of coercive power.
I do not believe that states are a. Concerned with the rule of law and b. Willing to let the source of their income opt out voluntarily. If I had an example where states behaved this way, I might be more inclined to come down on their side.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: