Comment: Facts and Fictions

(See in situ)

Facts and Fictions

The facts were well understood by some people in history.

The facts are well understood by some people today.

The facts will be well understood by some people in the future.

The fact that people have, are, and will increase the standard of living and lower the cost of living because some people know the facts is one of those facts.

How, factually, do people increase the standard of living and lower the cost of living?

More people gain access to the facts.

Is it factual that non-fraudulent money is purposefully removed from many people by a few people?


That is fraudulent money defined as a mathematical measure of fraudulent money working as fraudulent money works in time and place, working dynamically.

So Karen Hudes offers some facts concerning an obvious, accurately measurable, set of future possibilities; she says in few words is a fork in the road.

The modern version of the Dark Ages.

The modern version of the Renascence.

In more specific terms there are studies done by people who are modern specialists in cutting edge calculations of future possibilities. This should not be hard for people to understand because the same type of competitive calculation is done by any insurance company as actuary analysis of risks, which is simply a means by which current investments are based upon cost/benefit studies based upon past experience.

The information exists, and it is not a sound bite, not something easy to read, not something easy to know, like someone saying that we, people, are at a fork in the road.

The Dark Ages can be seen as much higher costs of living and much lower standards of living world wide, due to a continuation of the World Money Fraud Domination.

That means, in real terms, that people will not gain access to non-fraudulent money in our future, because that is the path taken by the people of the world.

Modern Dark Ages occur because people do not gain access to non-fraudulent money, world wide, and therefore trade, and all the advantages of trade, does not occur as compared to the other path that can be taken.

Modern Renascence occurs in the future of mankind as people regain control of non-fraudulent money, and so their earnings are no longer flowing to the few criminals who maintain that fraudulent money, and therefore trade, and all the advantages of trade, work to increase standards of living, and lower costs of living, compared to the continued subjugation of the people of this planet by the few people running the criminal money fraud system.

Instead of this:

Instead of that, which is already dead, instead of that farce as the official account (an obvious fraud), there will be two extreme possible futures expressible in words.

Modern Dark Ages, Currency Wars, Trade Wars, World Wars, scarcity of everything, no non-fraudulent money, no trust, no division of labor, no specialization, no economies of scale, no increase in standard of living, only decrease in standard of living, no decrease in cost of living, only increase in cost of living, until the darkest of times before a return to some opposite PATH whereby people will begin again to use non-fraudulent currency (including money).

Modern Renascence, No Currency Wars (instead currency competition whereby one competitor offers higher quality and lower cost money, and that better non-fraudulent money gains market share, until some other currency competitor raises the bar), No Trade Wars (because trade wars or "protectionism" occurs because of currency wars), no World Wars (because world wars are caused by trade wars), abundance of everything that people want and are willing to work to trade for, because now people keep what they earn, because now people use non-fraudulent currency, and now people gain access to higher scales of division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale, and now, instead of lower standards of living in the future, now there is higher standards of living in the future, and now instead of lower costs of living in the future, now there are higher standards of living in the future.


If the criminals are no longer in charge of the world, forcing people to use the fraudulent money, forcing people by fooling people, like all the readers on this forum who are fooled, and all the people who read this forum who are fools, and all the people who read this forum who know better, forcing everyone, by fraud, forcing everyone by threat of violence, forcing everyone by aggressive violence, NO LONGER in charge, when the criminals are no longer in charge, then competitive forms of money are allowed to flood the market.

The problem with Karen Hudes, and her story line, is that she is under the impression that Gold is the only hope of man, or some other such concept, whereby the same old lie works the same way.

There is only ONE solution.

That is a lie. The ONE solution is called Free Markets, or Liberty, or Freedom, or whatever is, in time and place, MANY SOLUTIONS, whereby each individual can pick the better solution to fit their individual problems.

The ONE LIE is Crime, and Crime is not a solution, Crime is Crime.


If Gold, or Gold Backed Money (redeemable in Gold) is added to the current supply of ONLY FRAUD MONEY, then that has to be done in such a way as to EXPOSE the FRAUDULENT TAX.

If Gold floods the world economy what happens to the world wide price of Gold?

If Gold floods the world economy who is given the Gold first; who gives the Gold to who gets the Gold?

Use your own brain.

If Gold floods the world economy through pay checks ONLY.

What happens?

If Gold floods the world economy through non-interest bearing loans, ONLY, then what happens?

If Gold floods the world economy by dumping gold into the streets of the worst places where the worst people have taken over those people in those places, then what happens?

Where is the Gold right now?

Are those the best people? Did those people collect all that Gold in a way that constitutes moral virtue; in other words did those people who have all that Gold get that gold honestly, did they earn it according to non-criminal means?

If all the Gold, or all the treasures of human kind, are now held, and kept out of circulation, by a very few people, and there are two roads ahead, then those two road ahead can be seen in this light.

Those few criminal people grow even more powerful in the future while those many victims grow even less powerful in the future.

More of this:

Worse than that, worse than that because those few criminal people buy World War III, so as to maintain their fraudulent money system, and they cause Russia and Nato to fight, while China is held back to take over the War Debt Collection Agency, or World Reserve Fraud Currency Power, or World Bank now based in China.

That is the Dark Ages warned of by that sweet little lady; who may or may not have all the facts lined up, and she admits as much.

Instead of more of this:

Instead of more of that, in a new Asian based currency FRAUD POWER, instead of that, there is a flood of POWER no longer kept secret, kept out of the hands of the competitors, whereby the criminals are no longer in charge, and the criminals no longer avoid accurate accountability concerning precisely how much they stole from specific people in time and place.

So the stolen loot returns back to the victims who had their earnings stolen from them.

How does that happen?

Anyone who paid interest on a loan can reasonably receive back to them what was stolen from them.

Anyone who paid Federal Income Tax, which was, is, and will be a crime in progress, unless it is stopped by defenders, anyone having paid will have their earnings returned to them, as part of the process of regaining Liberty in our time, in our country.

So added to investors investing their earnings are such things as more employers seeking employees to help them compete in a new age of NON-FRAUDULENT, NON-ANTAGONISTIC, Competition, free markets, where the demands are met with competitive supplies, including the supply of job opportunities.

The opposite of a criminally run government power, and the opposite of a criminally run money power was known, is known, and can be known, if people want to know better.

If people prefer abject belief in falsehood without question, then that is what they will get.

First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product. Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.

The answer to a criminal money monopoly is not another, "better," criminal money monopoly.

If Karen Hudes is offering the nuts and bolts of both the problem, and ONE solution, then she may not understand the problem well enough to be an authority on THE solution.

Free markets.