I think they stand. All these things violate NAP and are based on the principle of group aggression against the individual being valid if the group thinks such aggression is in its interest, which outweighs that of the individual. This is antiNAP.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site mo