are you okay with initiating physical force against someone who has not committed physical force or fraud against someone else's person or property?
"aggression is a normal, legitimate and necessary function of society."
Under what circumstances do you consider it "normal, legitimate, and necessary" to initiate aggression against someone who has not engaged in physical force or fraud against someone else's person or property?
Fun with etymology:
In the 1610's --> aggression (n.) - "unprovoked attack"
In 1828 --> AGGRESS'ION, n. The first attack, or act of hostility; the first act of injury
When is aggression against non-aggressors "normal, legitimate and necessary"?
"No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." -- Thomas Jefferson
"Every man is free to do that which he wills, provided he infringes not the equal freedom of any other man." - Herbert Spencer
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul