Comment: But that is what you agreed to above.

(See in situ)


But that is what you agreed to above.

Look at your post "I agree" above. That is "dominionist" reasoning. I am not assuming anything. I'm simply pointing out that to which you agree.

That post suggests greatly increasing the current population based on the idea that "we just need more people (and implied more technology---that is, more destructive technology like the current technology which even makes the current population viable) to get the resources."

That says "The environment is ours to deplete and destroy." At least that is what it says to me. And you agree with it.

As for your last comment:

> I honestly fail to see how my choice to defend
> the rights of unborn children means...

You honestly fail to see simply because you fail to be honest. (I said nothing about your choice to defend the rights of the unborn. I did say something about you agreeing to violate those rights along with the dominionists.)