Comment: So...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: retaliatory force (see in situ)


Why does a politician advocating for a criminal act become responsible for the crime, but not the millions of people who support the politician and his decrees?

I admit this is a complicated issue and it's difficult to draw a clear line.

"Violators of the NAP are subject to retaliatory aggression"….AFTER receiving due process. Not vigilante justice that identifies their crime and punishment merely based on the badge they are wearing.
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*