Now you've been reduced to advocating for victimless crimes, in contradiction to your own earlier arguments!!
On other threads, you've said that drunk driving or other reckless endangerment, and menacing, are not crimes until someone is hurt.
Now you have to claim pointing a gun is aggression, lmao.
And that isn't even relevant to my point, which was that if he hit murderers, he would not be guilty since they had what was coming. This is necessary on your other principle of justifying aggression against those presumed innocent, by post facto guilty verdict.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: