I overlooked the link at the top.
Yes, I was agreeing that for justice in a specific instance (you just misinterpreted my meaning of justice as some kind of platonic form of 'all justice as such') it will often require violation of NAP.
The point being that NAP cannot permit justice to be done in cases that require arrest or capture by a third party on suspicion or accusation, since these are not self defense, but aggression.
Sorry for the confusion with where your confusion was.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: