Comment: Waaaa?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Before a arbitration company (see in situ)


An "arbitration company" can do whatever it wants.

"Overwhelming evidence" in the opinion of whom?

"Reasonable doubt" according to who?

Why would an arb company have access to someone's DNA?

Why wouldn't he get far, he can't be arrested for a DNA sample until already proven guilty...

Are you suggesting arb companies have access to a DNA database of all people?

Are you suggesting people who refuse DNA samples shouldn't have rights-protection?

How can an arbitration panel trust DNA results, they're not scientists, and mistakes and mix ups take place. There is plenty of room for doubt about a DNA verdict.