Comment: Trolls need kibble too!

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: it's Bill3, the troll (see in situ)

Trolls need kibble too!

Hehe, I know it's him.

I really doubt ignoring him will send him running, and I'm not sure that would be good anyway?

His arguments are easily demolished, and the casual reader who will be faced with these arguments by statists might be helped by seeing them so demolished.

He's a literary foil, who by making plausible, but easily debunked arguments gives us an opportunity to elaborate and makes our position look good.

If one of us just writes a piece on rights, or natural law, or the NAP, or justice, or whatever.. people won't be as inclined to read all that as they are to read the more or less contentious discussions we have with 3$BILL. Does that make sense?