Comment: Linked

(See in situ)


Linked

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/comment/1551#comment-...

This next message is offered as Public Notice.

This is my pathetic attempt to communicate the idea of a canary in a coal mine.

Public Notice

My earlier offers of an opinion from one of the volunteer jurists was, and remains to be, that I am backing off of a narrow focus. That means, in real terms, that I am not involving myself, my will, my energy, my time, my power, in forcing the issue concerning what John Darash believes about 1787, and how diametrically opposed I am to such Rule by Man, Might (supposedly) making Right, Do unto other's before they do unto you, Dictatorship, Tyranny, Monopoly, Monarchy, Earthly Kings, George Washington, Hamilton, and John Adams in particular, and their fraudulent Federalism, and their fraud documented as a false Constitution hatched as slave traders do, and did, in Philadelphia.

Backing off of that narrow focus does not mean that I give up on chipping away, piece by piece, all the other falsehoods that have obviously infected so many people, not just fearless leader. So I back off of a direct frontal assault, face to face, with fearless leader, because doing so can only, as far as I can see right now, cause harm.

So I keep my mind open. I keep studying, and I keep offering one viewpoint from one of the volunteer jurists; one who has experience on a jury.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0zRD-Ulv2s

In that are these words:

Time: 1:50

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

In context to our fate as Americans whose free market, voluntary, federation of autonomous, sovereign, self-defensive, separate, Constitutional, Republics (most with their own competitive versions of a Bill of Rights), were taken from us, by criminals, by criminals calling themselves the "Federalist" PARTY (a.k.a. political faction, a.k.a. organized criminals hiding behind the color of law, seeking dominance as the only power, as Earthly Kings) the CURRENT words spoken by the current whistle blowing reporter daring to report the facts, has, himself, been fooled.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

That is the same message offered by the Federalists, in deed, not in words. Of course the criminals say one thing, and of course the words sound good, and of course the words end up opposing their deeds.

The pen being mightier than the sword cuts both ways too.

Lies cover up the criminal use of weapons of mass destruction, so lies are mightier (when lies are believed by the fools) than the sword.

So this reporter on this form of information linked, translated into English, repeats the same old, tired, unbelievable, lie, when someone cares to know the actual truth.

First, to repeat the monopoly, lie:

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Next a competitively more accurate spark of moral conscience, formed into effective defense, realized in time and place:

Here:
http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentuck......

Quote:_________________________________
Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.
____________________________________

As soon as I read that for the first time the message quality was immediately recognizable. That is a concise explanation of free market, open source, voluntary, self-defensive, non-aggressive, non-criminal, able to defend against all enemies of Liberty foreign and domestic, as I have ever read before and to this day.

There are many other similarly constructed messages all through the records of messages offered by our true founders (those against the power grab of 1787, and those for The Declaration of Independence, and a Bill of Rights, and trial by jury according to the true common law), but that offer of words, in that specific context, in that book, sums things up as well as I've ever seen to date.

My pathetic offers of excessive, persistent, redundant, overly complicated, wordy, messages do not compete well with that message in those quotes above, but there is context.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Between 1776 and 1787, in America, there was, in fact, proven, demonstrated, something that has been, something most certainly was not the same old power grab, so claims that "there never has been any other" are false, since there has been, between 1776 and 1787 something other than abject belief in falsehood without question.

What was something other than abject belief in falsehood without question was powerful enough, defensively, to defend Liberty against the largest criminal organization then destroying all life on earth.

Now, unfortunately, those who taught the Nazis, those who taught the Communists, those who taught Pol Pot, and financed all of them, are our home grown versions of fearless leaders, cult of personality strong men redo, a standard fraud, the same old thing, dictators, whose strings are still being pulled by the same types of Money Changers that ruled, criminally, in the time of Jesus.

Again:
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard171.html

"In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled from camp; above all, lengthy floggings were introduced for all practices that Washington considered esthetically or morally offensive. He even had the temerity to urge Congress to raise the maximum number of strikes of the lash from 39 to the enormous number of 500; fortunately, Congress refused."

Does that sound at all familiar?

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Military people know this stuff, perfectly well, as to how wars are won by defenders, and how wars are lost by stupid, dictatorial, wasteful, users of Cannon Fodder.

Users of Cannon Fodder must consume their own so as to "justify" their position as Strong Man, Cult of Personality, and Fearless Leader, or Fuehrer.

During the Revolutionary War the voluntary militia, combined with constitutional republic military units (some more voluntary than others in those 13 Republics), fought a mixture of gorilla warfare, taught in part by the Indians, and standard, dictatorial, involuntary Military Tactics.

If you care to know about Military Tactics, from one of America's best, then consider looking into the life, and work, of John Boyd.

Here is a start:
http://www.amazon.com/Boyd-The-Fighter-Pilot-Changed/dp/0316...

He was one who did not tolerate, stupid, dictatorial, false, authorities.

What about this:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/...

Someone calling into the Monday Conference Call offered some very wise advice concerning the absolute necessity of finding original copies of wet ink documents so as to defend against the obvious methods of the criminals when the criminals counterfeit the official record.

Again, concentrating on deeds, not so much the words, of dictators, the events defined by the Federalists as soon as they stole power, including the conscription of an aggressive army of tax collectors, this so called Whiskey Rebellion, as that Watermelon Army invaded a formerly independent, sovereign, self-defensive, Republic, that was once Pennsylvania, BEFORE, the criminals incorporated it, monopolized it, cartelized it, took it over, by PEN, and then by violent aggression.

That was 1794.

What was done easily to the people in America, enslaving them with false belief in false leaders, is not so easily done in Europe.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Those people have a much longer history dealing with what they are led to believe to be the only way.

The monopoly way.

The might makes right (tm) way.

Is there any evidence of another way?

Not if you don't look.

Back to the conversation in Russia at time 34:27

Note how those defenders defending against the slaughtering of innocent people are blaming the Americans who control Mass Media.

So...

Common denominators:

Innocent people trying desperately to warn each other concerning their temporal salvation in the face of abject evil as innocent people are being tortuously, horribly, and massively slaughtered.

Note: http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/death/deat...

The Mass Media controlled by the opposition (Americans blame the Communists, and the Russians, who are no longer communist a.k.a. no longer Bolsheviks, the Russians blame Americans) spin the news by offering half truths, which sound really cool, believable, but the actual facts turn out to be quite the opposite.

So...

Back to here:
http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentuck......

That book has to do with the buildup of armies on two sides, financed by ancillary, capillary, veins, branching out from a root power, or Central Monopoly of Control. The book has to do with mounting antagonisms born out of a Dirty Compromise that began in Philadelphia 20 years earlier, that book has to do with a man named Madison, a Federalist, who parted ways with the criminal Monarchists, and joined forces with one of the so called Anti-Federalist, or Democratic Republicans, in opposition to the Involuntary Union.

That book offers this:

Quote:_______________________________________
But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter.
_________________________________

Born out of 1787, and the Dirty Compromise, in America, where the slave traders divided up the spoils of their victory, the slaves, dividing, sharing, but only temporarily sharing, as honor among thieves is as counterfeit as the money they offer to their victims, the result was the inevitable clash of Monopolists, each seeking to dominate their respective slaves, and as always there is an aggressor initiating the violence, and as always the first casualty is the truth, as to who fires first.

The first shot was a bunch of criminals signing a document in Philadelphia, sealing the fate of millions.

Born from that Dirty Deal was control over legal money, as envisioned by countless criminals since, again, at least the time of Jesus.

Hamilton's First Bank of the United States was defeated, in part, by the work of someone named Jackson, no friend of the hated Indian, friend of genocide, but certainly not a friend of the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order, their Bank of England, and their subsidiary, ancillary, arm in these Colonies hidden behind this false Federation.

So Jackson kills the Central Bank in America, and someone shot Hamilton.

Factions?

Divide and conquer.

The only way. The only way.

Unless one cares to look, and unless one cares to question their firm belief in the only way.

A time of Wild Cat Banking ensues, and again animosities over who owns which lot of victims resumes, but what ever did happen to those papers penned, in ink, by Madison and Jefferson?

I wonder what the unabridged, un-doctored, un-spun, un-edited, versions look like.

Here are some official looking copies:

http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Kentucky_Resolutions_of_1798

"Furthermore, the Federalists were passing numerous controversial laws, including the Whiskey tax (which led to the Whiskey Rebellion), a law establishing the First Bank of the United States, and finally, the Alien and Sedition Acts."

So, history buffs, in need of some entertainment, not that the information could do anyone any good, ever, but what wrongdoings were done in Massachusetts whereby those wrongdoings inspired Shays's Rebellion?

Can I offer a quick summary?

The wrongdoers tried to enslave peaceful people in Canada, going out on a war of aggression, and these people lost, so the money they spent to pay for the criminal army was gone, spent, consumed, no more, and they had nothing to show for their efforts, no spoils of victory, no plunder, no loot. So what do do, what to do, what to do? How abut this idea? An idea at least as old as Jesus!

Why don't we print even more fraud money to pay ourselves for our trouble, we pay ourselves in gold, but we pay everyone else, not in our group, with fraud money, and in order to get the gold, we tax those idiot farmers for daring to create their own money, in the form of whiskey, and we tell them that they have to pay us in gold.

Wonderful idea?

So that works out as expected. The idiot farmers start using the same tactics used to fight the criminal British, same tactics, peaceful tactics, using facts, using networks of volunteers, using accurate accounting, gaining currency by inspiring a Spirit of Liberty, and when that does not work, the idiot farmers move in more forceful ways to shut down the Chancellery Courts where the bankers are enforced debt collection. When that doesn't work there are ex-Revolutionary War veterans leading the way to follow their duties declared in that independence document signed back in 1776, July 4th.

As expected, thousands of people joined forces on the Revolutionary side, and as expected the criminals worked effectively to crush that Spirit of Liberty in Massachusetts.

So, as expected, the tax on whiskey, payable in gold, whereby there was no gold because the fraud money drove out the gold (Gresham's Law) resulted in violent conflict between those who are lead by such things as The Declaration of Independence, on one side, call them Rebels, Levelers, Rabble, Insurgents, Terrorists, and Revolutionary Friends of Liberty, or call them by their names, but know what happened, please.

So that happened.

So why did someone come up with the bright idea to do the same thing again?

Why did, after 1994, when the Federalist Party Strong Man conscripted an army of tax collectors, invading a former Sovereign Republic, why did, after that tax collection agency did its work, why did Madison, who actually helped sell off our Liberty in Philadelphia, combine forces with Jefferson in 1798?

So there were those Kentucky Resolutions, ink on paper, penned by Jefferson.

How about the Virginia Resolutions?

http://www.constitution.org/cons/virg1798.htm'

Quote_______________________
That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

That the General Assembly doth also express its deep regret, that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the federal government, to enlarge its powers by forced constructions of the constitutional charter which defines them; and that implications have appeared of a design to expound certain general phrases (which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were the less liable to be misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular enumeration which necessarily explains and limits the general phrases; and so as to consolidate the states by degrees, into one sovereignty, the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the present republican system of the United States, into an absolute, or at best a mixed monarchy.
________________________________________

And the Federalist Party Leadership says bla, bla, bla, where are my spin doctors?

Basically, you can take your Liberty and firmly, rigorously, stuff it where the sun don't shine?

Joe