Compared to whom? Any of the other possibilities are arguably worse, and all of the previous presidents have had worse prior experience. Most were simply professional politicians.
There are no saints to rule so no one is fit to rule. This is why we shouldn't have rulers.
But since we don't seem to have a way to be rid of them yet, despite not being a Rand fanboy, if we have to have a president, who that will run would be better than Rand? (except maybe Gary Johnson who isn't very likely)
We need to be able to vote for no one. No thanks, we'll do without government 'help' for 4 years, you guys can take an unpaid break.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: