Comment: You have a way of reading in what wasn't even implied

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Evidence? (see in situ)

You have a way of reading in what wasn't even implied

Smiling at your humorous reply, I already know the jury of peer readers here will judge this reply as more factual and consistent than whatever time saving options you offer.

First, I said, "a child or adolescent may deal with that damage, (molestation), in different ways", and that that behavior may be among other behavior options, as there were nine other behavior patterns in 1 Corinthians 6, listed as patterns broken by faith. There was no "claim" about dealing with molestation leading them only there, as you accuse me of needing evidence for. I can't defend what I didn't say, eh?

Sexual molestation, especially at a young age, ought to be expected to warp what ought to be a time of healthy innocence. Forcing anyone to deal with sexual trauma at any age is obviously wrong, but more so when the formative identity of who we are in this world is twisted that way. Though other reasons may come into play for why anyone chooses to be fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, effeminate, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, or extortioners; it does seem reasonable that sexual abuse by adults likely makes abusers of themselves with mankind more prevalent than other reasons.

Nature has never flourished by making that which can't reproduce itself. It never has, and never will. Got any examples? No, I didn't think so.

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass