Comment: More currency

(See in situ)

More currency


I will offer study through two sources of information alternating between them.

Source A will be Trial by Jury

Source B will be the falsely named Anti-Federalist Papers

Starting with a very troubling discovery in the falsely labeled Anti-Federalist Papers Numbered 40.

It was a common saying among many sensible men in Great Britain and Ireland, in the time of the war, that they doubted whether the great men of America, who had taken an active part in favor of independence, were influenced by pure patriotism; that it was not the love of their country they had so much at heart, as their own private, interest; that a thirst after dominion and power, and not to protect the oppressed from the oppressor, was the great operative principle that induced these men to oppose Britain so strenuously. This seemingly illiberal sentiment was, however, generally denied by the well-hearted and unsuspecting friends of American liberty in Europe, who could not suppose that men would engage in so noble a cause thro' such base motives. But alas! The truth of the sentiment is now indisputably confirmed; facts are stubborn things, and these set the matter beyond controversy. The new constitution and the conduct of its despotic advocates, show that these men's doubts were really well founded. Unparalleled duplicity! That men should oppose tyranny under a pretence of patriotism, that they might themselves become the tyrants. How does such villainy disgrace human nature! Ah, my fellow citizens, you have been strangely deceived indeed; when the wealthy of your own country assisted you to expel the foreign tyrant, only with a view to substitute themselves in his stead. . .
But the members of the Federal Convention were men w e been all tried in the field of action, say some; they have fought for American liberty. Then the more to their shame be it said; curse on the villain who protects virgin innocence only with a view that he may himself become the ravisher; so that if the assertion were true, it only turns to their disgrace; but as it happens it is not truth, or at least only so in part. This was a scheme taken by the despots and their sycophants to bias the public mind in favor of the constitution. For the convention was composed of a variety of characters: ambitious men, Jesuits, tories, lawyers, etc., formed the majority, whose similitude to each other, consisted only in their determination to lord it over their fellow citizens; like the rays that converging from every direction meet in a point, their sentiments and deliberations concentered in tyranny alone; they were unanimous in forming a government that should raise the fortunes and respectability of the well born few, and oppress the plebeians.


A method of discovering the facts to then have facts with which to deliberate on questions of law can be used in this case. Find the names of the people who constituted the Continental Congress as they were the Federal government under The Articles of Confederation.

There is then three lists of names:

1. Those signing a Declaration of Independence

2. Those members of the Continental Congress

3. Those members usurping Liberty with their secretive, false, Con Con of 1787

Cut and pasted from the falsely named Anti-Federalist Paper number 40 (a) is:

"For the convention was composed of a variety of characters: ambitious men, Jesuits, tories, lawyers, etc., "

I've read only about half of the text in the falsely named Anti-Federalist Papers but that reading has opened my eyes to many new understandings of what was actually happening during the time between declaring our duty as free people to defend each other against criminals who take over governments, in 1776, and then that criminal take over of our government in 1787.

There were a group of people called Quakers, for example, and they were pacifists, or conscientious objectors to the concept of violence used to gain anything. That type of driving principle is not the same as the driving principle driving ambitious men, Jesuits, tories, lawyers, etc., and so there are groups:

1. Patriots (those include over 10,000 patriots murdered by the Red Coats in so called prison ships, or "hospital" ships, and other extermination camps)

2. Quakers

3. Those who were on the side of the Patriots, but all they could do was be raped, or otherwise abused by the Red Coats, because they were ill equipped to violently defend themselves when that is the last option before being raped, or otherwise abused by the Red Coats.

4. Ambitions men (here the obvious list of names include those merchants working in collaboration with other merchants, and bankers, and politicians, whereby their trade is drug pushing, slave trading now called "human trafficking," money monopolization, and the criminalizing, cartelizing, monopolizing, of governments.)

5. Jesuits (see:

6. Tories

The idea behind the study and employment of FACTS in the past (a.k.a. Accurate History) includes the often repeated practice of the criminals as the criminals create a pack of lies to replace the FACTS in the past, and therefore the necessity of discovering the FACTS in the past despite the very well worn practice of stealing the wealth of people so as to then feed people a pack of LIES that so happens to aid the criminals in the work of stealing the wealth of the people.

So the past includes people known as Tories.

The present can be discovered in 4 offers of current information:

1. Replacing History with False History:

2. Modern Day Tories (Keep meticulous records - as did the Nazis):

3. Explaining modern day Tories (Red Button Story)

4. Modern Day Jesuits (Controlled opposition must be understood)

A comment on numbers, and then a move to Trial by Jury:

The criminals who take over MUST control the opposition. This is as simple as knowing how many bullies are active on the playground in kindergarten. Some kids figure it out. There is the teacher, a bully, then there is one of the big kids, and which one controls the opposition in time and place?

When the criminals take over there just so happens to be piles upon piles of corpses of dead people. How many names of dead people count up to 8,000 dead people, for example?

If one person spoke each name, in an effort to help communicate the salvation of souls, or whatever idea inspired someone to speak each name, how long would it take to speak each name?

How much time and effort was required to torture and murder each one?

No one asks vital questions? Not just here, but other places too?

When is it a good time to ask vital questions? When is a good time to insist upon accurate answers? Is anyone other than myself and my son, known to me, able to offer their experience in trial by jury?

From Trial by Jury (Essay by Lysander Spooner):


The work done by Lysander Spooner is very simple. The volumes of words, the walls of text, the profuse use of English language, reinforces the simple truth.

How about a confirmation on the precise meaning of justice, before going further into the work done by Lysander Spooner on Trial by Jury?

The Science of Justice (Lysander Spooner)

The ancient maxim makes the sum of a man’s legal duty to his fellow men to be simply this: “To live honestly, to hurt no one, to give to every one his due.”

This entire maxim is really expressed in the single words, to live honestly; since to live honestly is to hurt no one, and give to every one his due.



The right of juries to judge the honesty of the laws.

That means that each individual member of the whole body of people has a duty to pay their dues, their tax payments, in the form of jury duty, and that is how each King makes sure that each other King is honest in time and place.

I know, I know, that is not how Lysander Spooner arranges the English symbols so as to convey the intended message intact - without distortion.

" live honestly..."

Two practical examples:

1. You sit on a jury and you try a case where Karen Hudes is blowing the whistle on the Jesuits and the New World Order as those two factions are now battling it out to see who owns everyone else on this planet.

2. You sit on a jury and you try a case where Walter Burien is blowing the whistle on the local Major in your town as the so called taxes collected in your town are funneled into a FUND used at the exclusive pleasure of a few people named in the secretive paper work documenting the actual flow of POWER on a NET basis - not a false BUDGET basis.

Who decides if Karen Hudes is off her rocker if she starts speaking about Alien races with elongated sculls?

If I am on the Jury, and you are on the Jury, then we may have a conflict of opinions on that point.

My point would be that it is entirely possible that Karen Hudes did see someone posing as an Alien with an elongated skull, and she bought into that charade because it looked real from her viewpoint at the time and place where that event took place. She was not able to seize the man posing as an Alien with an elongated skull, cut into the fake scull with a scalpel, or sharp knife, and expose the counterfeiting operation for all to see, including herself - as a possible explanation for that DIVERSION away from the actual case.

If the case were a case whereby NO ONE in their right mind would ever use fraudulent money as OUR money, then what Karen Hudes has to say on that subject might be worth checking out, to find the FACTS relevant to that case, as my offer to a fellow jurist, as we endeavor to do what?


The law, so called, says pay the IRS an extortion payment, and the IRS demands FDRs, or Federal Reserve Notes as payment. Where does that POWER go? Does that POWER finance World War III so as to then cause Russia to do battle with Nato, so as then to allow the Central Banking Criminals to set up shop in Asia so as then to collect all the War DEBT accumulated during that crime in progress that has been a crime in progress since at least 1787 here in America?


I am an actual jurist. I sat on an actual jury. So has my son. We the people have this experience in FACT.



That is the so called "official" Web Page for The Constitution where I look for the official version of the Bill of Rights. That has recently changed from the FACT it was, to the FACT it now is, and if you care to look, you can see a change in the numbering, done by someone, done in time and place in fact.

Quote (cut and pasted from that official web page):_______________________
Article the seventh... No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Article the eighth... In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Article the ninth... In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

That musical chairs effort to confound the Bill of Rights numbering was done after (coincidence?) a caller called in on the Monday Night National Liberty Alliance Conference Call to tell John Darash about the original copies (wet ink) and the significance of working with those original copies, including the Bill of Rights (numbering 12).

I don't have original copies. I have a copy (a physical printed copy) of the following book:

I took that with me to every meeting I've gone to where people in California met for National Liberty Alliance business. I've witnessed the "constituting" of Counties 3 times now, meetings in Riverside, Kern, and Temecula. I did not find occasions to share quotes in that book at those meetings.

Here is a .pdf copy:

The reason for that book to be delayed in printing had to do with a gag order placed upon the people attending the first Con Con. What type of people gags people?

Inside that book are copies of the Amendments to the Constitution . There are 12 Articles.

The book (at the beginning of the pages in the book) prints this:

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1838, by
In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia

1838 is after these events:

1. 1787
The British return with a covert operation known as a Con Con in Philadelphia intending to re-Monopolize the 13 colonies into one central banking fraud and extortion wing, or satellite, of the Bank of England.

2. 1789
Judiciary Act, to nullify trial by jury, of the people, for the people, and by the people, replacing trial by jury with Admiralty (English) Courts under false names of supreme dictatorship.

3. 1790
Rhode Island RAT-ifies the criminal take over as the last independent republic to fall victim to the false advertizement campaign run by the criminals who called themselves The Federalist PARTY.

4. 1790
Naturalization Act, a cover up name for marking the names and whereabouts of the victims, a head count.

5. 1791
The First Fraudulent Central Bank Scheme of the United States, directly linking the satellite bank with the supposed "enemies" The British and the Bank of England

6. 1794
The new King Proclaims the Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation, a false name for conscripting an army of slaves to invade the former independent Republic of Pennsylvania to crush the spirit of Liberty, enforce a criminal tax, and end a money competition then gaining currency as whiskey.

7. 1798
Alien and Sedition Acts, the British influence (supposed Enemies) the second American King, another False Federalist named John Adams, to punish anyone daring to side with the French (those who aided the defeat of the English in the so called Revolutionary War), and anyone daring to criticize the False Federalist, criminal, take over, for the British Bank of England, by those False Federalists. This by the way is done despite the Bill of Rights and the 1st, 5th, and 7th Amendments.

8. 1798-1799
The Rebels (against the criminal British and their minions running the American take-over) gain the services of a former Federalist named Madison, and both Madison and Jefferson pen resolutions intending to re-establish a working Federal design to push back against the Monopoly, or Monarchy, established by the traitors with their Con Con and other crimes.

9. 1800
Jefferson, a Democrat, a Republican, a Democrat-Republican, proponent of Federal government (labeled as an anti-federalist) is voted into the position of Monarch of America, foiling the plans of the False Federalists.

10. 1811
Jefferson, the true Federalists, end the First Criminal Fraud Bank, Central Bank, of the United (British) States (colonies).

11. 1812
Madison, a Democrat, a Republican, a Democrat-Republican, former False Federalist, turning his coat from Red, back to Blue, is voted in as the second "anti-federalist" Monarch.

11. 1812
The British attack. The true Federalists defend.

12. 1816
The Second Criminal Central Banking Fraud, Satellite of The Bank of England is established in the British Colonies where the people still think they have a true Federation. Madison turns his coat once again.

13. 1833
Jackson, Democrat, no longer a Democrat - Republican, of course not, the enemies change color so often, KILLS the bank by fiat, so executive fiat, a benevolent dictator, ends the "private" fiat of Central Banking, severing again the connection to the Bank of England.

14. 1833 to 1861
Known as Wild Cat Banking there is in America a time in which free market banking contends with Central Banking, seeking dominance, seeking investors, as free market banking goes head to head with the criminal versions.

1838 was Martin Van Buren as Monarch (a.k.a. "President") of the British Colonies (a.k.a. Bank of England - slave traders, drug pushers, human traffickers, rapists, torturers, mass murderers, etc. )

Andrew Jackson has killed the bank (a.k.a. Central Banking Fraud, Second Bank of the United States)

It was a time of Wild Cat Banking (competition against monopoly) in America, before The so called Civil War.

A quick search discovers:

Keep in mind, fellow jurists, a maxim of economics. No one in their right mind pays more for less. That means that banking, like computers or cell phones, improve over time as the people paying for these things FORCE the people who make these things to improve the quality of these things while the people who make these things are also FORCED to lower the cost of these things when COMPETITION is allowed to happen, and when MONOPOLY is not used to make people insane (out of their minds).

It is insane for people to use Federal Reserve Notes. Use of Federal Reserve Notes virtually ensures, it finances, World War III and the torturous, horrid, terrifying death of hundreds of millions of people so as to secure World Reserve Currency Power in either The New World Order or the Jesuits, or whoever else is in that criminal Market.

It is insane not to allow competition, real competition, free market competition, not false "free market competition," in money (accurate accounting) markets.

Allowing free competition (not false "free") ensures that the quality of money (accurate accounting) goes up while the cost goes down.

You must get a handle on this, and the following three quotes (with sources) MUST be understood:

1. Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy

Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.

That explains FREE MARKET GOVERNMENT in a few words. FREE MARKET FORCES FORCE suppliers of government to supply every higher quality government at ever lower costs of government. The criminals go out of business when a working Federation works. That is abundantly clear in those falsely named Anti-federalist Papers; which include the END OF BLACK SLAVERY as FACT during the time when the Continental Congress people were the Federal Government under The Articles of Confederation; between 1776 and 1787. The Con Con Con Job (a.k.a The Constitution) reclaimed SLAVERY as a LEGAL PRACTICE in the damn document itself.

If not for the true Founders insisting upon a Bill of Rights (12 or 10?) there would no longer be any question as to the complete takeover by the human traffickers, drug pushers, rapists, torturers, murderers, and mass murderers. You know this, you know their inculpatory evidence that is in your face, the fraud money, the extortion payments, the piles upon piles of dead people that always pile up when the criminals take over, such as those 8,000 people listed by name murdered by the Red Coats and their Tories , their Layers, their Judges, their ambitious men.

So you know the fix, it is right there in that book, in those few words, where FREE MARKET GOVERNMENT, in the form of a working Federal Voluntary Union, fixed BLACK SLAVERY for one thing, and fixed Fraudulent Banking for another thing, in this place we call America.

What happened to ruin these people here in America?

Same source:

1. Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy

But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter.

That is, as a mater of discoverable FACT, a confession. We the people earn our credit by our honest work. The criminals then claim that they own you. The criminals then claim that in order for their property to gain "credit" the criminals spend their fraudulent money at their pleasure, and they call that National Debt, and they send the bills to the people who earn credit by their honest industry.

That is a patented process. That is the same process used by the criminals in the time of Jesus. That is the same patented process used by the Communists.

If you can't see that, then I, and anyone like me, is going to have a hard time with YOU in a jury trial.

YOU are the problem in that case if WE are deciding a case in a Trial by Jury, because you are so damn ignorant.

I'm not sorry about it either. If YOU are so damn ignorant then it is your responsibility, accurately accountable to YOU, to stop being so damn ignorant.

What is at stake?

8,000 more Patriots piled into a ditch? Can you name each name, or is it much easier to just finance their torturous death? Work all year up to July, pay the extortion fee, with the fraud money, and then fiance the next pogrom. It won't be you in the hell on earth, so who cares?

Next quote is vital:

1. State Socialism and Anarchism:
by Benjamin R. Tucker (1854-1939)

First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product. Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.

OK, jurists, if your damnable willful ignorance has infested your brain to the point where you salivate on command like Pavlov's dogs at the mention of the word socialism, then YOU are a modern day Torrie, and I'm not on YOUR RED COAT SIDE.

That small offer of words from Benjamin Tucker (publisher of LIBERTY MAGAZINE) explains all you need to know to see why the criminals must create Thesis (Socialism), Anti-Thesis (Capitalism), so as to end up with Synthesis (Central Banking Monopoly Fraud).

When FREE MARKET (capitalist government or private government) GOVERNMENT (socialist government or public government) works as proven by the Federal model between 1776 and 1787, the demand for public and private government is supplied by individual people working in groups in COMPETITION (non-aggressive, non-antagonistic competition = not the false might makes right version of competition involving crime as a tool) to supply the higher quality and lower cost product viz - the best Constitutional Republic that private money can buy VOLUNTARILY.

That is my version. The version offered by Benjamin Tucker is his version. If you can't see the simplicity of how capitalism does work when capitalism is actually working in an actual free market, without the Central Banking Fraud on top of it, then you won't understand these words:

"Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise."

That turns false capitalism (fascism, crony capitalism, monopoly, communism, legal crime) on its head.

When the criminals take over they steal everything worth stealing and then they use the stolen loot to steal more, and the obvious, accurately measurable, result of that is a lot of dead bodies, as that works like a sink being sunk by the rats on the ship, and each rat is then at each other rat's throat, as all productive capacity is used up in killing each other while the supplies of everything worth stealing dwindles down to nothing, like the remaining air as the ship sinks, and all the wet rats are then breathing water.

The criminals know this, so they know when to move of their ship they sink on purpose.

They don't care that there are piles of bodies floating down the river. They make money on that FACT.

You don't get it?

You still don't get it?

How about one jurist on one place at one time asking another jurist a question, a vital question, and then both jurists refuse all answers that are not competitive, in other words, we can make a list of 10 possible answers to the vital question, and then we these two people discover, deliberately, the one best possible answer out of the 10 we discover in due process of law?

Vital Questions (10 for a possible effort to find 1 best 1 out of 10):

1. If people work in America, creating wealth, is an accurately accountable amount of that wealth stolen and then used to finance World War III, so as to move POWER to Asia, where people in Asia will then be collecting WAR DEBT (so called) from people working in America?

2. If 1 is true, then can we the people in these Republics like California, and we the people in these Counties in California like San Bernardino, can we find those accurate accounts of those transfers of wealth flowing from we the people into that FUND that is then used to finance World War III?

3. If 2 is true, then are those accurate records those extortion payments known as Internal Revenue Service Tax Liabilities, and those payments that are known as Interest payments made to a Central Bank, such as The International Monetary FUND, whereby criminals are operating a counterfeiting racket, and therefore all so called "interest" payments and all so called "tax liabilities" are, in FACT, the accurate record of the incuplatory evidence proving the FACT, that people in America are financing their own demise, and those FACTS constitute our authority to know we have been had, in a big way.

4. If 3 is true, then can we the people help each other defend each other against any further damage?

5. If 4 is true, then can we the people use trial by jury because we the people want to defend ourselves?

6. If 5 is true, then can we the people use the Bill of Rights (original ink copy preferred) as evidence proving the FACT that people can use FACTS as their authority to defend each other?

7. If 6 is true, then can we the people use common law grand jury due process as a process that affords everyone LAW, including the criminals, as a defense against any crime whatsoever in time and in place?

8. If 7 is true, then can we the people randomly select 25 people in each county and with just 3 cases can we the people end the central banking fraud, the extortion racket, and the practice of following criminal orders without question, in each county, in each Republic, in this Federation that we work as a true Federation?

9. If 8 is true, then what do those 3 cases look like on paper?

10, If 9 is done, who will do it?