Words and definitions are only useful in the process of communicating ideas.
Hence, in most debates, definitions are stipulated to at the beginning. The same with legal documents.
You refuse to acknowledge your grossly misinterpreted definitions, and insist on arguing for them. That's fine. Stipulating your definitions are correct and you can have a 100% voluntary government, then there is no disagreement. It's bullshit though.
100% Voluntary = Anarchism, but whatever. I don't care what you call things as long as the concepts are correct.
Further, you take both sides of every position. As only an anarchist pretending to be a minarchist can do.
I am not sure what YOU think intellectual debate is, but this isn't it.
The Philosophy Of Liberty -
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: