The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: It wasn't reflexive - it was logical.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: If she wasn't gay would you (see in situ)

It wasn't reflexive - it was logical.

I wasn't defending her, as I said: I don't like her. I was clearly pointing out that there is no need to attack her sexuality/sexual orientation. I think the better question for you to ask: if Maddow wasn't gay, would RonzdaMan have bothered to throw that potshot about her? I would bet the answer is 'No'. Anything about Hillary or Pelosi is irrelevant, unless Maddow is reporting/propagandizing something about them that is worth commenting, rebutting or laughing about. It is pathetic attacking gay people, particularly gay women, with potshots because/about their appearance. Same with those who say Michelle Obama was/is really a man. Re-tard-ed.