My entire argument is that its not a case of israel taking half of palistine but .25 percent of the ottoman empire. My argument is that a lot of nations came into existence in the same time period.
Seriously why is it right for all those other nations to form after the fall of the ottoman empire but not israel? They had the highest population for the area they took, they owned 14% of the land and a majority of the rest was government owned land. As soon as they announced their independence they were attacked (since when is the guys defending themselves terrorist?). The only question is annexing territory in a defensive war legal.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise r