Comment: to do what?

(See in situ)

to do what?

correct me if i'm wrong, but did this post come about because of the recent fallout over paying off sorvenson, and the weasels who sabotaged ron paul's campaign? i seem to recall tom being critical of some of those people. would tom have been a better choice than benton? i would say yes, or at least he could have hired the right crew. this isn't a matter of trust, but rather skills. ron is not superman. he cannot be brilliant at everything.