Comment: The difference is that Ron

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: one idea (see in situ)

The difference is that Ron

The difference is that Ron Paul actually means what he says and has a 30-year record to prove it.

That stuff sounds good on paper, but the Republican Party *DOES NOT* represent those ideals. I know, I've been a registered Republican all my voting life and have watched it shift with the wind for years. If it *did* represent those stated ideals, I certainly wouldn't be supporting a long shot candidate like Paul; I'd be supporting the Republican Party's best chance of winning (whoever polls highest).


"We should have a strong president -- strong enough to resist the temptation of taking power that a president shouldn’t have." --Ron Paul