I was neutral on the article until I saw the bullet points, makes quite an impression on the reader. It seems like an attempt to pin all the "hot button" issues to Ron Paul in order to stoke the passions of liberals and conservatives. The modus operandi seems to be to take some of the issues that Ron Paul thinks should be dealt with at the state level (and not at the Constitutional level) and box him into a simple "for" or "against" stance. This does not even take into account the Constitution, what it means when weighed against the issues, and why he has voted the way he has. For example, gay marriage: he is not simply "for" or "against" gay marriage. What Ron Paul is "for" is that this topic is not something the Constitution was written to protect or outlaw, and therefore he would vote against any legislation protecting or outlawing the issue. Seems like this simple concept always escapes the media.
We have a long way to go!
RON PAUL 2012