HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Weekend Reading: Amusing Ourselves to Death

Editor's note: The book Amusing Ourselves to Death, by Neil Postman, was first published in 1985. I just stumbled upon it last week. What follows is a short excerpt from the introduction to the Twentieth Anniversary Edition by Neil's son Andrew, and the brief Forward to the book by Neil. I highly recommend this book. - MAN

Introduction - by Andrew Postman

Now this?

A book of social commentary published twenty years ago? You're not busy enough writing emails, returning calls, downloading tunes, playing games (online, PlayStation Game Boy), checking out websites, sending text messages, IM'ing, Tivoing, watching what you've Tivoed, browing through magazines and newspapers, reading new books - now you've got to stop and read a book that first appeared in the last century, not to mention the last millennium? Come on. Like your outlook on today could seriously be rocked by this plain-spoken provocation about The World in 1985, a world yet to be infiltrated by the Internet, cell phones, PDAs, cable channels by the hundreds, DVDs, call-waiting, caller ID, blogs, flat-screens, HDTV, and iPods? Is it really plausible that this slim volume, with its once-urgent premonitions about the nuanced and deep-seated perils of television, could feel timely today, the age of Computers? Is it really plausing that this book about how TV is turning all public life (education, religion, politics, journalism) into entertainment; how the image is undermining other forms of communication, particularly the written word; and how ouar bottomless appetite for TV will make content so abundantly available, context be damned, that we'll be overwhelmed by "information glut" until what is truly meaningful is lost and we no longer care what we've lost as long as we're being amused...Can such a book possibly have relevance to you and The World in 2006 and beyond?

I think you've answered your own question...

Foreword - by Neil Postman, 1985

We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.

But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another -- slightly less known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacity to think.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.

This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You may also be amused by...

The novel WE, by Yevgeny Zamyatin, written in 1920's Russia.

It anticipates both Orwell and Huxley.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)

http://www.amazon.com/We-...

Jerome K. Jerome

Thank you federalist and manystrom. New (to me) authors are always appreciated, and now I have three!

They Were Both Right!

It's just different strokes for different folks! On one hand you have Huxley's couch potatoes. On the other, you have Executive orders and phony (unconstitutional) laws laying the groundwork for an Orwellian police state ... for all those savages who just won't shut up and go along. .

mind games

TV and your mind .. http://www.youtube.com/wa... solutions ..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKvuowEgFWs and http://www.youtube.com/wa... there are answers to our problems

Soma

Everyone in Huxley's book took Soma. This was the equivalent of Prozak. Not much difference from what's going on today.

The Orwell book has the infringement of privacy issues, and the Huxley book takes people who can barely even feel anything emotionally because they already know their lot in life (the Soma helps) and everyone is disposable and forgotten.

I like the juxpositation of the two books. I never thought of them that way because I never thought of them together. I never compared the two of them against each other. Sweet.

It looks like...

The powers that be are achieving Orwell's vision of the future by way of Huxley's vision of the future. Employing Huxley's vision made it possible to achieve the kind of brainwashing necessary to have the populace accept much of the Orwellian laws that we are allowing to be imposed on us. The only hope is to wake up and act as change agents in society. I do this through homeschooling my own children and educating everyone that I come in contact with. This year, the Ron Paul movement has accelerated this process and we need to continue this revolution in thinking to the rest of the populace. The best thing we can do is continue to pull back the sheep's clothing that the wolves in our government are hiding behind so that the sheep will finally work with us for real change.

There can be no good without God.
Atheists Presuppose Theism
http://presupposetheism.b...

I agree wholeheartedly with

I agree wholeheartedly with your post, but I just have to say that the title of your blog is patently absurd, aside from being true in the obvious grammatical sense.

Sadly, I'm not at liberty to debate the matter in any depth here (those with your viewpoint have a history at this site of ganging up and silencing those with mine), and I can't participate at your blog because you don't allow anonymous posts and I don't allow Google to set their profiling cookies on my machine. :-(

Edit: It turns out I had to allow that cookie anyway, if only for a few moments. I was compelled to respond to one of your entries. :-)

----------
Liberty for Dummies

“Chain of Command for Treason”

DEFEATING THE "CHAIN OF COMMAND FOR TREASON"

http://www.newswithviews....

Listen to the first hour of

Voices From the HeartLand w/ Greg Evensen
Saturdays, 12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM ( Starting March 1st) at

http://www.dailypaul.com/...

It's a great way of defeating these elites at their own game.

Pass the word folks

This book is a perfect

This book is a perfect complement to this other one:

Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture by Stuart Ewen

http://www.amazon.com/Cap...

These two books together will thoroughly "squeegee you third eye" bringing you to a more fuller understanding of what our culture is really about and why it is so. Very, very enlightening.

WE ARE THE RON PAUL MEDIA!!!

.

+

Pure Evil does not know it is Evil.

...and neither does pure Good.

Technology is NOT evil.

"Why'd you choose such a backwards time in such a strange land? If you'd come today you would've reached a whole nation. Israel in 4 B.C. had no mass communication. " Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar

We CAN communicate a message of education MUCH greater than the top level interests and we must continue to do so!!! Tell EVERYONE the truth, whisper it where needed, speak it where needed, scream it where needed, but tell everyone the truth!

Television,etc.

Repeat a lie enough times and it will become the "truth". If Goebels (Hitler's propaganda minister) had had access to television, we would all be speaking German today.

Those who have primaries coming up...

Copy this article and pass it out:

Why Vote for "Lesser of two Evils" When you Have Ron Paul?
There was nothing more to Eisenhower than the fact that he was a factotum of the conspiracy for world government. He fired Patton. He conducted Operation Keelhaul, in which he forcibly returned to the Soviets a couple of million people who had used the war to escape. Some of those people had served in our military in our uniform. Many committed suicide rather than return to Stalin. Mothers threw their babies off bridges and then jumped off themselves. Eisenhower was merciless........

http://www.newswithviews....
by Alan Stang

And for those who need to convince unbound delgates.

1984 and Brave New World are

1984 and Brave New World are the "options" that are being put before us.

And most people given the "option" will pick BNW.

But the REAL story, the story behind the big show of "1984 or BNW", is Animal Farm.

Some animals just want to be more equal than others.

*sigh*

What's a care bear to do?

I love Aldous Huxley

Fortune Favors the Bold

This isn't directly related, but Island by Huxley is also worth a read. It was written later in huxley's life and presents his vision of what a real utopia based on humanity and spiritual fulfillment would look like.

This Book is Dynamite

I read Neil Postman's book when it was first published. I use it when I teach at a nearby university. No book published in the last 50 years is more essential reading.

This book is dynamite. I urge everyone to read it.

--
"The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked."
- Ron Paul

Minuteman

You don't happen to teach at University of Oregon Eugene do you? That's where I was told about Amusing Ourselves To Death about 10 years ago. Tis a great book.

Like Musical Chairs,

As long as the music keeps playing, we have no worries. I fear however, when they have so much control through technology, whether it be from implantable chips or from a space station; the music WILL stop. When that happens, there is never enough chairs for everybody.

Ignorance is BLISS.

I got Brave New World as my

I got Brave New World as my toilet reading currently. It seems slightly more arrogant and instep with the culture of the early 1900s than Orwell's novel..
I think Huxley's description of social engineering lead to Orwell's caste system in 1984.

Tho , im not sure if the two authors were contemporaries.

Its Just book 1 and 2 of the trilogy of whats going on.
Im glad I can wipe my "*ass*", put the book down.
im still in the first phase of Brave New. I was assuming before the link between Hux and Orwell. If those stories meshed well, it would be no suprise to me.

I think

Roger Waters, bassist/songwriter of Pink Floyd

did a solo concept album Amused to Death based on this book by the late Neil Postman. Roger Waters uses hard hitting and bitter satire as well as some innovative musical effects and tough lyrics. Jeff Beck plays guitar.

Waters opens the work with a BBC interview with Alf Razzell (age about 90 at the time) who was a British soldier with the Royal Fusiliers in World War One. In 1917, Alf Razzell had the job of collecting pay books, records and personal belongings from the bodies of dead soldiers. On the album, Alf talks about a fatally wounded fallen comrade Bill Hubbard left behind in No Man's Land.

In another part of that BBC interview not on Water's album, Alf Razzell makes one of my favourite quotes which is echoed in what Dr. Ron Paul says about our foreign wars of intervention.

Alf said, "At the end of any war, everyone sits around a table and comes to some agreement. Why don't they do that before the war instead?"

Very, very powerful album

I had no idea it was based on this book. Thanks for the insight.

"Our American friends are late home tonight."

Watching TV - from Amused to Death

I lived in China for 5 years. I lived with the students, ate what they ate, drank what they drank, worked and lived with the laobaixing (the common people). I don't dislike China. I love the people and I loved living in China. I can read and speak the language and I know what is good and what is not good in China in a Chinese way. I have my opinions about it.

Part of Roger Waters's concept music based of Postman's book is a take on the "Tian An Men Incident" of 1989. The song is called Watching TV. Roger Waters did his homework before he wrote this (there is some embellishment too, though). I often think of this song and the TianAnMen too when I think about the R[ƎVO˩]UTION.

watching TV - the video
http://www.youtube.com/v/...

She wore a white bandana that said Freedom Now.

- Did we do anything after that? -

I remember...

Watching this unfold at the time, the guy who defied the tanks was the most powerful image I have ever seen. I was a young bad ass ex soldier at the time, it brought me to tears

Wow, amazing video.

Yes, I remember watching it on TV just like the song. I was in awe of the young Chinese "freedom fighters". I have visited China twice and love the people and the culture.
________________

Good luck to us all,

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com

Can they both be right?

Can they both be right?

Ordered my copy

I've been saying it for years. TV rots the mind.
Looks like a good read. I wonder what the author thinks about the state of the country today.

My Shelfari page

Unfortunately

The author has passed away.

I wish it was 1984 again

The simpler life was a much better way to grow up. Technology will eventually kill us all. Go out canvassing tomorrow everyone. Keep up the great work.

Much better in the "old days"

No internet. Going to the movies was a big deal. Kids played outside until dark. People were politically incorrect but somehow friendlier.

I still don't have a cell phone and refuse to have a TV in my bedroom.

Teach your children to love and cherish books.
________________

Good luck to us all,

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com