Mod Suggestion Box
Submitted by Joη on Sun, 03/27/2011 - 01:31(Assuming the FAQ didn't help)

Comment here to notify mods
despite popular opinion, they are not omniscient,
and the site owner needn't be contacted about everything.
Joη likes suggestions along the lines of "I wish the site could ? ."
Note: this is not the "front page x" or "please post x" or "let's keep arguing unrelated subject x" box.
The "mod" in the post title stands for either "modification" or "moderator".
»
- Login to post comments





[upon it being back up]
thanks for notifying us...on the site.
NCMarc of FalconInternet:
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
Unpublish is foreign to me.
Unpublish or withdrawing post thrice may well be innocent. I wish all to be innocent mistakes... Mine or your is of little consequence. Unfortunately, the evidence weighs heavy. I seek to show the worlds travails in a helpful manner. Meaning no harm. Nourish understanding & sympathy. News photographs posted & linked were published by major new media April 15th. Analyst annotations describe the photographic evidence. I am thankful for the response posted to each of my DailyPaul threads. I work diligently on each & every post & reply.
I linked relevant DailyPaul threads as well. I could easily reduce the 3 posts to one or two, eliminating redundancy. Photographs were of the best focus found. The VetearnToday photo essay & editorial board postings here are what got me my interest to post more. Twas hard to stomach this mess. Seems contrived per the photographic evidence.
If you feel that major news reporting of April 15th, Boston was... counter to all evidence to the contrary... honest & upright, I am speechless.
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
"Jeff Bauman was a crisis actor" false claims won't be tolerated
that is all.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
bump
Ya' know, I really wanted to try to make peace, but when you reply to more recent posts, and you suspend my posting privileges without explanation or warning) and then refuse to acknowledge this... It starts to look like a personal vendetta,. I hope I am wrong.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
see below
Sorry I didn't respond on Mother's day to your 850 word essay ignoring my one question. I was with family.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
Most Contentious Comments
according to Jon. Yet mine has 3 upvotes and Jon won't allow responses to his post. What gives?
skippy
so says the great and powerful...
"mods"
rhymes with oz (almost) and carries the same type of connotation
did you expect us folks here at the DP (those liberty-minded who are drawn to it) to support ANY kind of censorship?
we are not wired that way
if its not a personal attack (sorry, I have been guilty of that) or, if it doesn't inherently seek to "destroy" this website by those things against the "law" of the land then it should be left alone to live and die on its on merit
I think those things are just "paulisms".
just sayin'
its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
Defeat CORKER! Bailed out the banks. In training to steal more.
Defeat ALEXANDER! Career traitor! Handsomely rich in a poor Nation.
When I try to view all "recent comments"...
...of myself or others, the screen comes up as if someone has put in criteria to do a search with criteria defaulted to my screen, rather than the usual list of all comments coming up.
I have not tried to search my comments with that function, let alone with the criteria that is in there, so not sure why it comes up like that.
I clicked a couple other members' names to see if it looked like that when I try to see all of their recent comments and it comes up that way on theirs as well.
Where it says "Subject or Comment", the word "contains" has been selected in the box underneath both, and the words "judy wood" are typed in under that. Where it says "Timestamp", the words "Is equal to" have been selected in that box under it, and the date and time "2013-01-01 00:00:00" have been put in under that.
So two questions:
1) Why is it coming up automatically with search criteria pre-filled to look for comments containing "judy wood" and with a timestamp selected?
2) How do I see the list like I used to be able to see of all recent comments if I'm not doing a search for specific criteria?
welllllll
if, signed in as you, you ever clicked on any of the links I had pointing to my comments on Judy Wood, I bet the site took those options and remembered them for your account on that page.
I've now set it to not remember them, and default to an option that shows all results.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
The subject, comment, and timestamp boxes...
...all now say "Is not empty (NOT NULL)"
Not sure what that means, but at least I can see the list of comments now.
The change where "judy wood" appeared in my search function is something recent, as it hasn't been too long ago that I'd looked at someone's comment list. I don't recall clicking any of your Judy Wood links recently, though, as the Judy Wood controversy is of little interest to me. But whatever happened, at least it's reset now.
Thank you for fixing it to where I'm once again able to see the comment list.
To Joῃ:
For a thankless job well done:

Please make note of the Mod Suggestion Thread RIGHT NOW
I posted a thread showing three instances of actors at drills in unrelated events. The headline has Jive Dadson over there whining at the mods about it, and the thread is VERY CLEARLY about asking people to look at the evidence and realize it is POSSIBLE that actors were among the truly injured.
Jive is not even reading the posts, just whining about headlines.
PLEASE VOTE HIS GARBAGE DOWN. How does one user get so much power over this community? PLEASE - vote me down if that is where your heart is, but I suspect most of you prefer truth over knee-jerk censorship.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
Too much fucking crying on
Too much fucking crying on here....geez....
"teacher so and so did this....so and so said that...."
Actors with fake injuries
http://www.dailypaul.com/285063/actors-with-fake-injuries
Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń
"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln
you see, a lot of times...
where people with a superior intellect seem to lack in common sense
I sense that here.
some people are naturals at computer logic and then, on top of that, work really hard to impress others with their narrative but all of that sometimes comes at a very high price
you see it over, and over again...common sense, the main and original focus, gets lost in the shuffle
its a true balancing act, realization is the first step
its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
Defeat CORKER! Bailed out the banks. In training to steal more.
Defeat ALEXANDER! Career traitor! Handsomely rich in a poor Nation.
I don't understand why threads can't just...
be allowed to live and die on their own merit (or, lack thereof)
the free market of the dp can easily decide what is relevant
you guys have the power to see if one, or two, certain people continue to bump threads and THEN you might put a stop to it but, arbitrarily choosing what lives or dies here will get you to lose members...seriously
ron paul has a new website, paul craig roberts has a new one...please don't run us off because you think your knowledge is more superior than the collective here
let the threads live and die on their own
you already migrated this site away from Ron Paul with your daily p au l, for goodness sakes
if you censor, we will flee
its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
Defeat CORKER! Bailed out the banks. In training to steal more.
Defeat ALEXANDER! Career traitor! Handsomely rich in a poor Nation.
New "fake blood" thread
http://www.dailypaul.com/285010/great-example-of-fake-blood-...
Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń
"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln
How about you step out from behind the curtain, wizard?
Rather than just delete posts, why don't you debunk them? Why don't you provide other points of view, other evidence that you consider important?
I am trying to keep a sense of humor about this, but I guess what REALLY galls me is the ability of a moderator to just "POOF" anything they do not like without discussion. The peons here have to learn to debate, provide evidence to back up their claims, and it makes us better at teaching others. You rob yourself of a chance to hone skills that are very useful in educating people, and you place yourself in a godlike role of "You all should provide sources and links to present your case, and I will just wave my magic wand."
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
while information is abundant this age, logic is lacking
They were debunked. See comments by mrbengal, Delysid, JoshArizona, me, and likely several other users I've missed because it has grown tiresome to wade through so many inane threads that don't bring about greater understanding, and instead muddy the truth and bog the gullible down with their own ignorance. Mods usually link to previous instances of content posted when unpublished, but dredging up old absurd content for no good reason doesn't compel them to be as helpful.
A sad reality is the abundance of media has led everyone (with absent to impeccable thresholds of proof) to draw every conclusion, and there are a finite number of correct conclusions to draw, but infinitely many wrong ones, and precious few who choose to learn how to explain why to the many, and even fewer who will listen.
Do you think Jeff Bauman didn't lose his legs?
Do you think "the media faked it all" or "there were no planes at all" on 9/11, or "it was all holograms", or they were dustified by nukes or space lasers?
Do you think the Felix Baumgartner stratosphere skydive was faked?
Do you think a missile hit an already-on-fire fertilizer plant because you misinterpret mic wind noise as a Doppler effect?
And that's all relatively recently. I could go on.
Do you want to promote, or even consider, ad infinitum, every conceivable interpretation of every possible thing? I don't. That's why there's a spam filter.
And I'm not going to promote stuff I know is false because I wouldn't want someone else doing the same to me. Have some good information in a post? Make absolutely certain nothing in it is demonstrably false, because it will be removed. That's not hard to do. Otherwise, one could draw the conclusion you don't really care about those you talk to.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
You sure put a lot of words in my mouth.
I said i want the TRUTH. I don't claim to know what happened on 9-11, but I know there was a felonious destruction of a crime scene on 9-12 that the US government was complicit in.
I KNOW they use actors in drills, so it is theoretically possible that Bauman was already a double amputee. I have not seen a picture of him before the blast with 2 legs. Have you?
I am certain the government has weapons we do not know about, and I am sure some of them are energy weapons. When and where they are being used, I do not know. I'd like to know. Maybe if we got a real investigation, we could answer many questions about 9-11.
It is BS, Jon. You throw a strawman scatter bomb of BS accusations at me, but did not debunk anything.
Good to be king?
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
then you don't know what you're saying
which isn't uncommon.
Who doesn't? Have you found it yet?
But you can know what absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt, did not happen, right? There were planes, explosions, victims; but no nukes, space lasers, or holograms, right? But you want us to tolerate those absolutely asinine and evidenceless suggestions because it's good to ask questions? Even if these questions help discredit the otherwise valid culture of conspiracy, regardless of who asks them, how many times they're flatly refuted, or how utterly illogical they are? Who does that help?
...Now, to be pluperfectly clear, are you implying in any manner space lasers or nukes brought down the towers (for which there is no evidence), instead of the planes and 'multiple explosions' which many witnessed first hand?
And I know the ISS exists (unlike some). I also know tuna exist.
No, it plainly isn't. Jeff Bauman clearly had legs before the event, then the event happened, then he didn't have legs.
with legs
without legs
with legs
without legs
with legs
without legs
If you bothered to investigate on any of the links I & others have provided, you would have know that. Anyone who considered the extent of such a "crisis actor" charade would conclude it would implode upon itself immediately and rightfully disregard it.
See how "Boston crisis actors" isn't a matter that can be debated further? If not, you have a terminal case of idiocy I don't want representing living organisms on Earth. However, I have hope that people can reason things out, and realize how preposterous it is to keep suggesting this, and move on from this point that has exactly 0% explanatory power or insight to the situation.
No, you completely ignored all the links everyone provided showing Bauman was really a victim. And it sounds like you bit, and are suggesting equally impossible things are within the realm of possibility, which depresses me, because it helps nothing.
You're becoming a victim, in your own way, of your inability to vet your own thoughts.
Before sharing ideas I first try very hard to disprove them, as I don't want to share things that might not be true. While knowledgeable people are few & busy, computers are ubiquitous and idle, so it is immensely valuable to learn how to ask computers questions for all fields of study.
I understand what teachable moments are, and that's why first instances stay up. But we're not going to promote absurdities.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
SO, if you have all these links to support your beliefs
why can't you link them instead of deleting posts? THAT IS HOW PEOPLE LEARN.
I have been asking if anyone had photos like that for weeks not, that is the first time anyone posted a link that I asaw. If they were up before I did not see them because YOU DELETED THEM, preventing me from seeing them.
It is power tripping BS to delete when we find the facts by DEBUNKINNG and leaving ALL THE RESOURCES UP for ANYONE to research.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
Your first "with legs" link is 403'd
The next one shows him in pants, you cannot confirm those are not prosthesis. And if the threads were still here when I got tp the site, I would have checked the links, but I have not seen those links before.
The rest of your tirade is petty nonsense.
Peace out, King Jon.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
*sigh*
*sigh*
It's intellectually lazy to just cling to a belief, without vetting it, until someone who knows better comes along. And unscalable, as there are more of one than the other.
If you had even a mild threshold of proof, you could have debunked this yourself long ago instead of spreading this absurd idea to take root in others just as gullible. I didn't delete every link on the internet (or even this site) explaining that.
And I can't tell what you're saying is 403'd. Anons can view what I've linked.
To be clear: are you still saying you think Jeff Bauman could be faking all this, and was a double amputee to begin with?
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
To be clear, I am asking WAS THERE A DRILL THAT DAY?
The inability of ANYONE to understand how simple my question is is truly astonishing. Who did what and who was injured and how re details I can never prove one way or another. But we could probably ferret out a definitive answer on whether or not there was a drill going on.
*sigh*
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
no, you're moving the goal posts & asking that now.
I pray it is because you've abandoned the insane idea that Jeff Bauman is a crisis actor, which I will consider progress enough; but then you post an absurdity from Stanly Monteith claiming yet again that Jeff is an actor.
So I'm really only looking for you to respond one way or the other on just this issue.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
Jon, I am going to try to clear this up.
First, you have to be willing to hear what I say. Can you get there? If not now, don't read this until you can.
I am not "moving goal posts" I am sorting this out in my own head. It took me YEARS to realize that the real question to ask about 9-11 is about the clean up on 9-12. It was a felony. For me, the proof of the power of this question has been in putting it to a couple firemen who were totally accepting the official story.
With Boston, others asked about Bauman's injuries. I have given the BEST INFORMATION I could find, as I found it. I began with my clearly labelled OPINION: That at the very least, he should have been passed out from blood loss, basically. My opinion is not without merit, I had EMT training and a Medical Assisting degree, I was taught how to treat femoral bleeds and it invo9lved tourniquets and lightning speed. You do not expect a person to survive. When my husband, an RN and paramedic for years, told me there is a way to cut an artery that sends it into spasm, I posted that, along with his credentials. The point I have tried to make is that it is a reasonable question. Any medical professional who is being honest will tell you that a bilateral femoral artery bleed is likely to involve LOTS of blood and a dead person. The images of him being wheeled around, pink, conscious, no tourniquets - it defies my medical knowledge. The fact that an orthopedic surgeon with 35 years experience says the same thing is presented as evidence that the question is reasonable.
Next, I get lambasted for links I never saw. Just because something goes up does not mean I see it. Many days, I walk away and leave the DP running, just because it says I am here does not mean I am really HERE, at that moment. I do not fish through old threads, I read the active posts, and reply to direct comments, best I can. I often get busy and miss links I fully intended to click. It is spring on the farm, my life is more than hectic.
When I point out that a photo of Jeff in jeans is not really proof, it is not because I "believe" one thing or another, it is simply a fact. For folks who get in such a twist about calling things proof, that is simply not proof. Sorry.
As questions have come up, people have given highly emotional reactions on both sides. Best I can, I have been sifting through the flame wars to find the "kernel. "The "9-12" of this, if you will. I got there a day or two ago, and have tried to focus on that question like a laser since then. No one can answer this, and it should be verifiable. Either the coach can be shown to have made it up, or more witnesses can be found.
I have been an emotional wreck myself, I do not like being accused of some of the nasty things that I've been accused of, and this day is one of my least favorites of the year, I've been on a knife's edge all week. But even if I were totally on top of my game, it would take me a while to get through all the "noise" to get to the heart of this.
I don't know you at all, I don't really know Nystrom. Nystrom is like a brother to me, though. As much as you want to follow his orders or whatever you are trying to do, I want him to know the truth. I certainly do not wish to be defiant, I have tried very hard to NOT claim "this is fake" or "that is proof." But there are really good questions that really need asked. I think Nystrom was traumatized, and I suspect the entire city was exposed to some sort of psy-op weapon. They have them, you think they don't use them? I have not really focused on that issue, it is "my theory" and I can not imagine any way of proving or disproving it, so a theory it remains. In Boston, there are legitimate questions. It is not a matter of "believing" Bauman or the old lady were injured, it is finding out whether or not there was a drill. If there was a drill, there were almost certainly actors. If there were actors, then we can perhaps consider trying to determine who was and was not injured. Frankly, that is a minor detail to me. If they are continuing the pattern of having "drills" and "attacks" at the same time and place, THAT is the truth that needs exposed.
Now, whether I know you or not, or whether I like you or you like me, or whatever we may disagree on - can we agree that knowing the truth is what Nystrom, the Nystrom we both love, would want?
4Peace, 4Love, 4Truth.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
if I had a serious question
I would make darn sure that there weren't any absurdities surrounding it, because then it would be ignored by people who knew better, and would be more likely able to answer my question.
If I were truly asking specifically whether there was a drill during the Boston event or not, I would not under any circumstances link to someone who agreed with me by thinking something absurd, like "Jeff Bauman is a crisis actor who staged losing his legs", which is exactly what you did. Monteith and you could have certifications a mile high and it wouldn't affect what actually happened one iota, and all the hospital documentation that goes with it.
This implies to me you're either not seriously seeking that answer, or you don't realize absurdities when you see them.
You knew better than to post that while having this conversation, but did so anyway (under an informationless title beginning with needless drama). That is why your posting privileges were removed, and will be returned once you've accepted this reality.
(A simple 3 second search on the boston drill that day led me to this and this. But that's just me, and I'm not debating this with you here.)
And you've now repeatedly chosen to not answer whether you think Jeff Bauman was a victim, which is answer enough for me.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."
Jeff Bauman: I DO NOT KNOW.
Furthermore, I don't much care, I care about knowing whether or not there was a drill that day. Do you care about that at all?
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
Jeff Bauman's case is not ambiguous
it is not always appropriate not to know. There is objective truth.
And I just linked above the extent of my curiosity about any confusing bomb drill on that day.
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it."