FORUM QUICK LINKS > News | Economy | DP Liberty Forum | Activism | DIGG! | Books | Videos | Events | RP Repubs | Rand Paul 2010

   

Does anyone find it odd that figures show China has over 4x population

of the U.S. but the U.S. CO2 emission is 2.3 million tonnes more than China? China has the most polluting cars and factories in the world not to mention the animals it takes to feed 1.3 billion people. The U.S. imports more $266 billion more than it exports to China, most is manufacturing, the U.S. has lost a huge amount of manufacturing which is where most CO2 emissions are born. Did you ever wonder how a country as large and as backward as China, how they can calculate the CO2 emissions? Do you remember the China Olympics, they shut down thousands of factories for hundreds of miles to clean the air? I think they are pulling these numbers out of their arse.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The chinese do have a pollution problem.

Remember the 2008 olympics?

Remember how they had to stop factories to clear up the air?

I don't believe the C02 is a problem, but pollution could definitely become a problem. In the 70's and 80's Los Angeles was pollution hell. The smogging of cars and emission standards has helped with that issue in those large metropolitan areas.

Global warming from C02 is pure B.S.
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.

------------

I'm still wondering ...

how does one weigh a tonne of CO2, which is a gas?

Can you also weigh a tonne of helium?

If so, how?

you do it by counting

1 mole of CO2 is made up of 1 mole of carbon that ways 12 amu and 2 moles of oxygen that weighing 14 amu each. 1 mole of CO2 weighs a total of 40 grams per mole.
1 mole of carbon when burned produces 1 mole of CO2
once you know how much fuel is burning you can calculate how much CO2 you are producing.

you can Weigh CO2

or helium. You do it by calculating the buoyancy of the gas, and subtracting that from the weight. You can also calculate it based on the amount of fuel you burn, but you have to make some assumptions about the products of the burning.

ironman77,

can you give an example of how to do the calculation which you are referring to?

OK lets say you fill a bag with CO2

You can put this on a scale and weigh it. say it weighs 0.3 grams - of course discounting the weight of the bag.

Then you find the volume of the bag, say it is 0.95 liters

Then you find the buoyancy - density of air times the volume

1.2 grams/liter x 0.95 liters = 1.14 g - this is the mass of air displaced by CO2 - or the buoyancy

Then add the 0.3 g + 1.14 = 1.44 g - this is the weight of CO2.

For an estimate from the fuel you use. .

Say you use 44 kg of propane. Propane burns according to the equation:

C3H8 + 5 O2 ==> 3CO2 + 4H2O

So you get 3 molecules of CO2 for every one of propane. Propane is 44 g/ mole so there are 1000 moles of C3H8, and therefore 3000 moles of CO2. CO2 is also 44g/mole, and so (44x3) 132 kg of CO2 is produced.

This can be done with any fuel.

Thanks, ironman77

Now I have some homework to do. LOL

wow

thanks

first....

there is NO GLOBAL WARMING.
like jfk was not shot with a nerf ball rifle.

second, much of the population of china lives vastly different lifestyles from those of americans...

that said......i totally agree with you.

we have a real choice.
between love and fear.

it is our duty to stand fast against whatever sheite be heading our way.

The whole thing is a lie

from start to finish.

There is no global warming.
IF there was any global warming, CO2 has nothing to do with it, and made-made C02 has less than nothing to do with it.

Since the entire subject is an invented lie for political control purposes, any numbers can be made up to say whatever they want to say, because NONE of it is real anyway.
It's ALL made up.

Of course it's a lie, even the numbers don't add up much less th

Of course it's a lie, even the numbers don't add up much less their logic

Thomas Jefferson once said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Well, I guess he called that one.

The UK has 14 Coal Fired Power Stations

Don't know about the US, but the UK has 14 Coal Fired Power Stations, China has around 4,500 at the last count, and is building a couple more every week.

U.S. has 600 coal fired plants and all are heavily regulated.

Thomas Jefferson once said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Well, I guess he called that one.

Exactly, UKLooney

Thomas Jefferson once said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Well, I guess he called that one.

And in the rural

areas they cook and heat with wood and coal.

America == modern ... China == becoming modern

The average Chinese family does NOT live a modern life... they use up no where near the amount of energy that Americans do.. there have been several documentaries in the past 10 years showing the daily lives of average Chinese... if you looked into this you would see exactly why America causes alot more polution than anyone else.

The United States still has

The United States still has a much larger Gross Domestic Product then China, which equals more manufacturing. I would say a large amount of Chinese people do not drive cars or have the ability to turn on fifty lamps, three tvs, a washing machine, and four air conditioners, like many houses in the United States.

I believe there is no way to calculate the far-flung people's of

I believe there is no way to calculate the far-flung peoples of China productive accurately.

Thomas Jefferson once said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Well, I guess he called that one.

They measure the fossil fuel they use

And estimate CO2 for that. Things like wood are not counted since that is only short term storage of carbon, while oil has stored carbon for thousands of years. BTW, Leaves decaying in the fall give off significant amounts of CO2.

Because

they use aborted fetusces for carbon offsets. http://freedomswings.word...

Because it is a bunch of crap

The left loves fabricating conspiracies to destroy the intelligence of Joe Citizen.
Global warming is one of those conspiracies. They will twist, manipulate and even ignore data to "prove" their point. Then attack anyone who disagrees.